News

China has moved from verbal warnings to concrete actions in reining in the heated price war in the automotive industry, signaling a decisive stance to safeguard the healthy development of the auto manufacturing sector and the real economy. The price war has led to a series of negative phenomena: new car prices continuing to hit record lows, potential compromises on the quality and pricing of unseen auto parts due to relentless cost-cutting demands from manufacturers, and industry hidden rules such as fixed-price sales and inflated orders aimed at creating an illusion of booming sales. Against this backdrop, China's State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) officially released the "Guidelines on Price Conduct Compliance in the Automotive Industry (Draft for Public Comment)" on December 12. Comprising 5 chapters and 28 articles, the draft aims to regulate pricing and sales practices, prohibit automakers from selling vehicles at excessively low prices, and thereby mitigate deflationary pressures driven by cutthroat competition. Insiders revealed that relevant responsible persons of certain listed auto groups have been summoned for interviews by authorities, indicating that the industry's price war has reached an intolerable level. According to the draft guidelines, auto sales must adopt clearly marked prices, and it is prohibited to promote sales under false labels such as "market price" or "clearance price". More importantly, the draft explicitly states that automakers selling products below production costs with the intention of eliminating competitors or monopolizing the market will "face significant legal risks" – a phrase mentioned six times in the document, underscoring the unprecedented deterrent effect compared to previous regulatory measures. Violators could face legal sanctions if they cross the red line set by the state. SAMR pointed out that the auto production and sales sector has in recent years been plagued by issues such as irregular price marking, price fraud, price collusion, and irrational competition. These problems have seriously disrupted market order and infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of both consumers and operators. Following the release of the draft guidelines, several major listed auto groups, including BYD, BAIC Group, Xpeng Motors, Leapmotor, Seres Group, and JAC Motors, have successively expressed their support. They stated that they will strengthen compliance management and strictly avoid price fraud and unfair competition. An analysis of Q3 financial reports by Automotive K Line shows that the performance of major listed Chinese auto groups remained sluggish in the third quarter, with worrying profitability that has spread to the upstream and downstream industrial chains. Data from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) indicates that the profit margin of the auto industry is only about 4.4%, significantly lower than the 6% average profit margin of the industrial sector. Given the particularity of the auto industry and the large number of jobs it supports, the state has been compelled to intervene to regulate the price war and irrational competition. In Q3 this year, among pure electric vehicle startups, only Leapmotor barely achieved quarterly profitability. Li Auto swung from profit to loss, while NIO and Xpeng Motors continued to incur losses. Even among new energy brands under established automakers, only Geely Galaxy was profitable. Brands such as Changan Avatr, Dongfeng Voyah, SAIC IM, and GAC Aion, which operate as independent entities, reported severe losses. All of these loss-making brands are seeking independent listings on the capital market, but the optimal window of opportunity has passed. Currently, China's auto industry is grappling with dual pressures of overcapacity and weak demand. Listed auto groups have been forced into a zero-sum game in the stock market to survive. Against this backdrop, the shift from warnings to concrete measures to curb the price war is of great significance for the long-term development of China's auto industry. Over the past decade, the number of new energy vehicle brands selling in China has plummeted from approximately 500 to around 110. It is expected that by 2030, only about a dozen brands will possess sustainable financial capabilities. The draft guidelines put forward price compliance requirements for the production, pricing strategies, and sales behaviors of both complete vehicles and auto parts. It is now open to public comment until December 22. Industry insiders anticipate that with the stabilization of auto prices, the financial conditions of listed automakers will improve. This, in turn, will enable them to allocate more funds to research and development as well as improving the quality of raw materials, ultimately benefiting both Chinese consumers and the country's auto industry.

In the first half of 2025, the automotive industry experienced multi-dimensional changes in technological breakthroughs, policy adjustments, and market games. The following five hot events profoundly affected the industry landscape:  1. China's automobile production and sales broke 15 million, and the new energy penetration rate exceeded 44%.From January to June 2025, China's automobile production and sales reached 15.621 million and 15.653 million respectively, an increase of 12.5% and 11.4% year-on-year. Among them, the production and sales of new energy vehicles reached 6.968 million and 6.937 million, an increase of more than 40% year-on-year, accounting for 44.3% of the total sales of new cars. This data marks that China has become the first market in the world where the sales of new energy vehicles account for nearly half of the country.   Through high-end design (such as the combination of intangible cultural heritage technology and V8 hybrid technology) and intelligent breakthroughs (such as Huawei Turing Longxing platform and NIO fully active suspension), the independent brands represented by Hongqi Golden Sunflower and BYD Look Up showed their strength on par with international luxury brands at the Changchun Auto Expo. At the same time, the cumulative application volume of the trade-in policy exceeded 4.12 million, activating the wave of consumption upgrading.  2. Solid-state battery mass production breakthrough: the world's first GWh-class production line is lit upAnhui Anwa New Energy has put into production the world's first GWh - level solid - state battery production line in Wuhu. The energy density of the first - batch shipped engineering samples reaches 300Wh/kg, and it plans to mass - produce 500Wh/kg all - solid - state batteries in 2027.   This production line adopts dry - electrode technology, reducing the production cost by 30% and being compatible with the production of ternary lithium, lithium iron phosphate, and sodium - ion batteries. In contrast, the mass - production plans of all - solid - state batteries by competitors such as CATL and Toyota still lag behind by 1 - 2 years. Anwa's technological breakthrough not only solves the combustion risk of traditional lithium - ion batteries but also makes it possible to achieve a 1000 - kilometer range with a 10 - minute charge, directly impacting the existing liquid - battery supply chain pattern.   3. International automakers' electrification strategy collective "brakes", hybrid technology returns to the stageFaced with the profit pressure of pure electric vehicles, German giants such as Audi, Mercedes-Benz and BMW have adjusted their strategies: Audi has withdrawn its plan to stop production of fuel vehicles in 2033, Mercedes-Benz has reduced the proportion of pure electric models in 2030 from 100% to 50%, and BMW has restarted the development of extended-range hybrid vehicles.   Japanese automaker Honda has reduced its electrification budget by 30%, while Toyota has strengthened its hybrid technology, and its fifth-generation THS system thermal efficiency has exceeded 43%. This shift reflects the division of the global market. North America's electrification process has slowed down, while China's hybrid models account for more than 30%. At the same time, the European Union passed an amendment to the GSR regulation, mandating that L2-level driver assistance systems (such as automatic lane changes) must meet UN R171 standards, including strict driver attention monitoring and hands-off warning mechanisms.  4. 8 million Pixel CIS Chip Shortage, Intelligent Driving Supply Chain Under PressureWith the popularity of BYD's "eye of the gods" and Tesla's pure vision solutions, the contradiction between supply and demand of 8 million pixel car CIS chips has intensified. Howell Technology, Sony, and ON Semiconductor monopolize 90% of the global production capacity, and the delivery cycle is as long as 36 weeks. This structural shortage directly affects the mass production of high-end smart driving models. For example, the delivery of Xiaopeng X9 is delayed due to insufficient supply of CIS. MIIT data shows that in the first half of 2025, the loading rate of L2-level and above assisted driving reached 77.8%, but the core sensors are still dependent on imports, and the process of domestic substitution needs to be accelerated.

  1. Porsche adjusts its battery strategy to focus on battery cell and system development  Porsche continues to see electrification as the core driver of the future, but due to the slowdown in electrification in China and the United States and policy changes, the company is making strategic adjustments to its battery business. Its Cellforce Group will focus on the research and development of battery cells and systems, and will no longer expand the production line of high-performance batteries. Porsche's electrification rate in Europe has reached about 57%, higher than the target set at the time of the initial public offering. The company still adheres to the strategy of hybrid, fuel and pure electric power in parallel, and plans to continue to launch Taycan, Macan, Cayenne and 718 all-electric models. Since the construction of the factory in Kirchentellinsfurt in 2022, Porsche Cellforce Group has completed the development and pilot production of high-performance batteries, but due to the lack of global market size, it is difficult to optimize the production cost. In the future, Cellforce will act as an independent R & D unit to provide technical support for Porsche and the Group's internal high-performance battery projects. Michael Steiner, a member of Porsche's executive board responsible for research and development, said: "We will continue to invest in all-electric models, and our experience in developing high-performance batteries will continue to serve the group while driving innovation into future products." Porsche has always been flexible in the global electrification process, focusing resources on technological advantages. Focusing on battery cell and system research and development, it aims to consolidate its leading position in the field of high-performance electric vehicles, providing support for future product innovation and the overall electrification strategy of the Group.  2. The new Mercedes-Benz AMG GT XX sets a new electric vehicle battery life record   Recently, the Mercedes-AMG new high-performance GT XX concept car showed its strong strength at the Nardó track in Italy: it drove 3,405 miles (about 5,480 kilometers) continuously in 24 hours, with an average speed of 186 miles (about 299 kilometers) per hour. During this period, it only stopped briefly due to fast charging, breaking the previous record of 2,461 miles (about 3,961 kilometers) of electric vehicle 24-hour battery life set by the Xiaopeng P7. The new record was no accident. The GT XX performed even better during the eight-day comprehensive test: driving a total of nearly 25,000 miles (about 40,234 kilometers), not only covering the OurHours endurance mileage record of 12 hours, 48 hours and even 168 hours (7 days), but also breaking a number of electric vehicle distance benchmarks. The test was completed by two GT XX concept cars and 17 professional drivers, including Mercedes-AMG F1 driver George Russell. The drivers used a three-shift rotation mode to ensure continuous driving, and more than 100 engineering and logistics teams in the background optimized the charging strategy in real time to escort the test. The core technology that underpins its outstanding performance is concentrated in two dimensions: the GT XX is equipped with an 800V electric drive system composed of three motors before and after, with a total power of up to 1341 horsepower, taking into account high performance and long battery life; the 114kWh oil-immersed cylindrical battery supports 850-900kW ultra-fast charging, and it only takes about 5 minutes to supplement 249 miles (about 401 kilometers) of battery life, greatly reducing the charging wait time. Mercedes-AMG said that the technology validated by the GT XX concept car will gradually be put into production models: including an electric GT four-door coupe based on the exclusive electric platform of AMG. EA, and a supercar SUV with a maximum power of 1,000 horsepower planned to be launched in the UK in 2027. Although the GT XX is still in the concept stage, its test results have fully demonstrated the brand's research and development foresight in the field of high-performance electric vehicles, providing a key reference for the performance improvement of future production models and the breakthrough of rapid replenishment technology.   3. Electric vehicle manufacturing accelerates, and India's automotive electronics industry is experiencing high growth  India's electronics manufacturing industry has grown sixfold over the past decade, with output increasing from $21.80 billion in FY2015 to $129.90 billion in FY2025 and exports rising from $4.40 billion to $37.60 billion. The Ministry of Information Technology and Electronics (MeitY) attributes this to production-linked incentive (PLI) policies, tax reform, and infrastructure support. The PLI policy focuses on supporting large-scale electronics manufacturing (LSEM) and IT hardware, attracting about $1.49 billion of investment, creating 130,000 direct jobs, and boosting the production capacity of automotive electronics and electric vehicle-related products. SPECS semiconductor subsidies, the Electronics Manufacturing Cluster Program, and the Public Procurement "Make in India" policy further support the development of the industry. Global EMS giant Flex India has eight factories to serve automotive, EV and enterprise equipment customers. Through Industry 4.0 technology, AI analysis, mobile robotics and automated testing, Flex has achieved a 95% increase in production efficiency, a 98% pass rate in first inspection, and supports the manufacture of complex automotive electronic systems through digital twin technology and precision machining centers. SME Mefron Technologies focuses on high-mix low-to-medium production, providing PCB assembly, complete machine manufacturing and end-to-end design for automobiles and electric vehicles, meeting 60% to 70% local value-added requirements and achieving differentiated competition. In terms of supply chain management, Flex enhances its resilience through modular production lines and regional supplier ecosystems, while Mefron has established procurement networks in India, Singapore, Taiwan, and China to reduce single supply dependency. The development path of two types of enterprises shows the layout of India's automotive electronics industry: global manufacturers drive scale and exports, and small and medium-sized enterprises enhance competitiveness with flexible design and localized manufacturing. With the rapid growth of electric vehicles and automotive electronics, India is steadily strengthening its position in the global supply chain.  4. Zoomcar is equipped with Google Cloud to integrate AI to enhance the sharing platform experience   In order to optimize the user booking experience, simplify the vehicle occupancy process, and strengthen the platform security, Zoomcar recently announced a deep cooperation with Google Cloud to integrate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and machine learning integration technology into the car sharing platform. The core function of this cooperation is "Host Assist". The AI assistant is based on the Gemini Flash 2.0 model and the Enhanced Retrieval Generation (RAG) framework, which can provide 7 × 24 hours of continuous platform entry guidance for car owners, reducing the average length of entry by 30%. In addition, Zoomcar is developing a "Host Intelligence Engine" to provide revenue improvement solutions for car owners through data-driven, such as dynamic pricing strategies, and to provide optimization suggestions by comparing the behavior of car owners and top operators of the platform.   At the same time, the platform uses AI technology to analyze the communication records between car owners and users, which can accurately determine the attribution of responsibility for disputes, reduce the number of owners who actively cancel orders, and further improve user satisfaction through targeted rectification. In terms of platform security, Zoomcar builds a real-time fraud detection engine based on its Customer Data Platform to identify suspicious behavior by reviewing user identification documents, customer authentication information (KYC) and selfie images. The system is expected to improve fraud detection accuracy and further enhance platform trust. Overall, Zoomcar's cooperation with Google Cloud this time is not a simple "technology addition", but from the supply side (car owners), demand side (users), and platform side (safe operation) to improve efficiency, optimize experience, and enhance trust. AI technology is used to solve actual business pain points, providing a reference direction for the technical implementation of the car sharing industry.   5. General Silicon Valley is recruiting talents and introducing AI experts to hedge against tariff pressure.  General Motors is aggressively bringing in AI talent in Silicon Valley. In the past eight months, the company has poached nearly a dozen experts from tech giants such as Google, Meta and AWS to establish an AI Center of Excellence in Mountain View. The core members of the team are all industry veterans. Barak Turovsky, the former head of Google's language AI product, is the chief AI officer of General Motors, and John Anderson, a former Google researcher and two-time Oscar winner of technology awards, is the executive director of AI research. The new team is fully committed to a number of key projects: developing factory "collaborative robots" based on decades of manufacturing data accumulated by GM to help workers cope with high-intensity processes and improve production efficiency; and simultaneously advancing the development of generative AI tools, vehicle over-the-air upgrade (OTA) process optimization, etc. These technologies will not only support the development of autonomous vehicles, but also help to increase domestic production capacity and ease the cost pressure caused by the new tariffs. In the second quarter of this year, tariffs have reduced the company's operating profit by $1.10 billion. The move follows GM's setback in autonomous driving, with its Cruise robotaxi project, which took nearly a decade and cost tens of billions of dollars, only to be halted at the end of 2024. GM sees the development as the "second battle" of digitalization and manufacturing upgrades. Dave Richardson, the company's senior vice president, emphasized that the move is not about shaping GM into the next Apple or Google, but about truly embedding software and technology strengths into the car and manufacturing process. "Our job is to combine the strengths of General Motors in the automotive field with artificial intelligence to create new competitiveness."  6. Rivian officially announces hands-free driving in 2026  Rivian, the US electric car manufacturer, recently announced plans to introduce point-to-point hands-free driving in cities and highways by the end of 2026. This feature will allow drivers to enter their destination and the vehicle will drive automatically throughout the journey. RJ Scaringe, the company's chief executive, said that the company will further promote "eye-free driving" in the future, that is, true autonomous driving. In an interview, Mr. Skallinger pointed out that most car companies' assisted driving is still at the L2 level, and drivers need to keep their attention, but in reality many users have used it as an L3 system. "Instead of maintaining superficial compliance, it is better to make the vehicle truly autonomous." As a must-compete track for car companies, the high investment and high risk characteristics of autonomous driving technology research and development are significant. Although Tesla, General Motors and other companies have invested heavily, some projects have been delayed due to technical bottlenecks and cost pressures. Rivian's clear functional implementation schedule means that it is accelerating its commercial layout in the field of autonomous driving. Market research shows that hands-free driving is the most anticipated new car feature for consumers. If Rivian can live up to its promise, it will gain a differentiating advantage in the intense competition for smart electric vehicles.  7. Car cyber security alarm: hackers can unlock and start vehicles remotely  On August 11, 2025, at the DEF CON hacking conference in Las Vegas, Eaton Zveare, a researcher at the software company Harness, disclosed that there were security bugs in a well-known car company's connected vehicles, allowing attackers to remotely control vehicle functions, track location, and view the owner's personal and financial data. Mr. Zweil did not name the carmaker, saying only that it involved a carmaker with a wide range of well-known sub-brands and that the vulnerability, if exploited maliciously, could affect a large number of vehicles. The source of the vulnerability is the online dealer portal of the car company: its login system is defective, hackers can bypass the verification to create a "national administrator" account, obtain administrator privileges, and then query the tool through the portal. With only the owner's name or vehicle identification number (VIN), you can bind any vehicle to your mobile application account and obtain permissions such as remote lock/unlock, start the vehicle, etc. Zvir has passed the test and transferred the vehicle application permissions of his friends to his own account, confirming that the vulnerability can be exploited. At present, the car company has fixed the vulnerability of the dealer portal and confirmed to Zweil that no other suspicious access was found except for its test, and the owner is currently using it safely. This incident once again warns that with the popularization of vehicle networking, the risk of automotive cyber security needs to be continuously vigilant.  8. BlueSG vehicles are transferred to Tribecar for long-term lease, and the sharing business is renewed and then on the road  After being suspended in early August for the restart in 2026, the electric vehicles owned by Singapore-based car-sharing platform BlueSG will be taken over by local car rental company Tribecar in 1-2 weeks, and will return to the market under the "Le Blu Frenchy" brand. The new model focuses on long-term leases, with leases ranging from 3 months to 2 years, replacing the previous short-term rental service with a minimum of 30 minutes. Tribecar will take delivery of hundreds of BlueSG electric vehicles that are between two and five years old and have a range of 50,000 to more than 100,000 kilometres. The vehicles are currently being tested, repaired and painted in preparation for delivery. Keith Kee, chief executive of BlueSG, revealed that the two sides are negotiating a "potential sale" of the vehicles to extend the life of the vehicles and drive towards carbon reduction targets. Prices have been a highlight of the comeback. The first 10 two-year leases cost S $799 a month, which is lower than the standard price of S $89, and the minimum three-month lease period is S $958 a month, both significantly lower than the Singapore electric vehicle rental market generally above S $2,000. Tribecar co-founder Adrian Lee said the plan had received positive market feedback after it was announced on social media on August 24. This partnership not only avoids asset idleness during BlueSG's outage, but also provides Tribecar with the opportunity to expand its electric vehicle fleet at a low cost, reflecting the win-win effect of resource revitalization and sustainable operation.  9. Lyft partners with Baidu to expand the European Robotaxi market  Lyft, the US ride-hailing platform, recently announced that it will partner with Chinese technology company Baidu to launch a driverless taxi service in Europe in 2026. The first pilots will be launched in Germany and the UK, with vehicles using Baidu's Apollo RT6 electric model and operated through the Lyft platform. This is also the first time Baidu's autonomous driving business has entered the European market. Lyft acquired European travel app FreeNow for $200 million this year, gaining access to network resources covering 9 countries and more than 180 cities. According to the division of labor, Lyft is responsible for platform operations, Client Server and fleet management, while Baidu provides autonomous vehicles and technology solutions. Lyft executive Jeremy Bird said that FreeNow maintains long-term communication with European regulators, which will help Robotaxi's compliance. The UK government plans to commercialize driverless taxis in the spring of 2026, and the policy accelerates to open the window for the industry. At the same time, companies such as Uber and Wayve are also waiting for approval to enter the European market at the same time. The alliance between Lyft and Baidu is seen as an important measure to cope with fierce market competition. Baidu has accumulated deep experience in the field of autonomous driving. Its Apollo Go autonomous driving service currently operates more than 1,000 vehicles in 15 cities around the world and has completed more than 11 million travel orders. This cooperation with Lyft is the first time it has commercialized autonomous driving services in the European market. The cross-border cooperation between Lyft and Baidu not only integrates Lyft's local operating resources and platform capabilities, but also takes advantage of Baidu's autonomous driving technology. This cross-border cooperation may reshape the regional autonomous driving competition landscape and provide a new cooperation model for the commercialization of global autonomous driving technology.  10. Australia plans to introduce road user fees to replace fuel taxes  Jim Chalmers, Australia's treasurer, announced after a three-day economic roundtable in Canberra that the government had reached a preliminary consensus on replacing fuel taxes with road user fees in "10 clear areas of reform". The national rollout will be based on the New South Wales plan, which is based on vehicle mileage, and the average annual cost is expected to be between 300 and 400 Australian dollars, but the specific standards, whether it will fully replace the fuel tax, and the application time of electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrids remain to be determined. The finance minister said there was strong support for the concept of a road user fee at the meeting and that states were developing a plan document and would discuss implementation details in further consultation with state and territory finance ministers on September 5. The government hopes to use the system to reduce fuel dependence while guiding vehicles on the road at different times to ease traffic congestion. Regarding the taxation of electric vehicles, the government plans to implement it in stages, starting with the pilot of trucks, and then gradually covering passenger cars. At the same time, the charging will be adjusted in combination with the travel time to pave the way for the comprehensive replacement of fuel tax in the future. This move shows Australia's strategic layout in the adjustment of transportation energy structure and intelligent travel management.

  1. As of the end of July, the total number of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China increased by 53% year-on-year.On August 22, the National Energy Administration released the national electric vehicle charging facility data for July. As of the end of July 2025, the total number of electric vehicle charging infrastructure (chargers) in China reached 16.696 million, a year-on-year increase of 53%. Among them, there were 4.202 million public charging facilities (chargers), a year-on-year increase of 38%; and 12.494 million private charging facilities, a year-on-year increase of 58.8%.  2. Hainan adjusts the 2025 car replacement update subsidy policyOn August 23, the Department of Commerce of Hainan Province issued an announcement to adjust the subsidy policy for vehicle replacement and renewal in Hainan Province in 2025. Starting from August 25, 2025, additional subsidy restrictive conditions will be added based on the "Implementation Rules for the Subsidy for Vehicle Replacement and Renewal in Hainan Province in 2025": For individual consumers whose new vehicles are purchased after August 25, 2025 (including that day, subject to the invoicing date stated on the "Uniform Invoice for Motor Vehicle Sales"), the newly purchased vehicles should be registered and licensed in Hainan Province; during the subsidy application review period, the newly purchased vehicles should be registered under the name of the applicant. The Department of Commerce of Hainan Province stated that this adjustment to the subsidy policy for vehicle replacement and renewal only adds the restrictive condition of "the place of new vehicle registration" on the basis of the original policy, and requires that the newly purchased vehicles should be registered under the name of the applicant during the subsidy application review period, which is an effective supplement to the original policy. Relevant subsidy standards, application procedures and other condition requirements still follow the "Implementation Rules for the Subsidy for Vehicle Replacement and Renewal in Hainan Province in 2025".   3. Jiangsu Implements the Price Standard for Vehicle - Grid Interactive DischargingOn August 22, Jiangsu Province has officially clarified the price mechanism for new energy vehicles to participate in the interactive discharge of the vehicle network, with a certain attractive discharge price standard, to further promote the interaction of the vehicle network into a new stage of large-scale and commercial operation. The interaction of the vehicle network mainly refers to the charging and storage of new energy vehicles during the trough of the grid load, and the reverse transmission of electricity to the grid during peak hours or when necessary, so that electric vehicles become mobile distributed energy storage units.  4. Tesla partners with Doubao and DeepSeek to access through ByteDance Cloud EngineOn August 22, according to media reports, Tesla has reached a cooperation with Volcano Engine. In China, Volcano Engine will provide large - model services for Tesla. The newly launched Tesla Model Y L will be equipped with Doubao large - model and DeepSeek model, and both models are accessed through Volcano Engine. Among them, the Doubao large - model will assume the voice command function, such as navigation setting, media playback control, air - conditioner temperature adjustment, etc., and also has the function of querying the owner's manual; the DeepSeek model provides AI voice chatting service.  5. Xiaopeng P7/G7 will soon launch full-scene VLA functionOn August 22, XPeng Motors announced that it will soon launch the full - scenario VLA (Vision - Language - Action Model) function for the P7 and G7 models. The VLA function can extract environmental information from sensor data, understand human commands, generate an interpretable decision - making process, and convert it into specific driving instructions. The specific functions include: recognizing yield signs and controlling speed, predicting "door - opening accidents" during temporary stops, predicting "sudden appearances" in blind spots, predicting risks when encountering accident signs, controlling speed in advance at intersection blind spots, recognizing and controlling speed in extreme weather, recognizing and controlling speed on water - covered roads, clearly recognizing displayed bus lanes, and recognizing and controlling speed on bumpy roads.   6. BYD announces construction of assembly plant in Malaysia On August 22, BYD held a launch event for the new BYD Seal in Malaysia, and announced at the press conference that it will build a local assembly plant (CKD) in Malaysia, which is expected to be officially put into operation in 2026.   7. Canada has cancelled a number of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, and auto tariffs remain in placeCanadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said that in line with the US tariff exemption policy for goods covered by the US-Mexico-Canada Free Trade Agreement (USMCA), Canada will remove retaliatory tariffs on some US products, but will not eliminate tariffs on automotive products and steel and aluminum products. The decision will take effect on September 1.  8. Tata Elxsi and Suzuki jointly open a new engineering center in IndiaTata Elxsi, an Indian design and technical services provider, and Suzuki Motors recently officially opened the "Suzuki-Tata Elxsi Cloud Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Center" in Trivandrum, India. The dedicated facility is Suzuki's first hardware-in-the-loop test center with full vehicle cloud verification capabilities, and is also the second engineering center established by the two parties after the offshore development center in Pune, India.  9. Toyota will launch a low-cost hybrid model in ThailandToyota Motor, the Japanese carmaker, said on Aug. 21 that it would launch its cheapest hybrid model in Thailand and restart sales of an electric vehicle in a bid to tackle competition from the rise of Chinese electric carmakers. The Yaris ATIV hybrid sedan starts at 729,000 baht (about $22,379), which is 60,000 baht lower than Toyota's most affordable hybrid model in the Thai market, the hybrid version of the Yaris Cross. Toyota's Yaris ATIV hybrid sedan sales target in Thailand is 20,000 units in the first year. It is reported that the model will be assembled at the factory in Chachoengsao province, Thailand, and about 65% of the components are expected to be sourced locally, and this proportion is expected to increase further. In addition, Toyota Motor also plans to export the hybrid model to 23 countries (including the rest of South East Asia).  10. Waymo receives first license for autonomous car testing in New York CityWaymo, the self-driving taxi unit of Google's parent company Alphabet, has received its first permit to test autonomous cars in New York City with a trained professional in the driver's seat. It is understood that Waymo can start testing with a limited number of autonomous cars in parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn

Recently, multinational automakers have successively released their financial reports for the second quarter and the first half of 2025. Due to fierce market competition coupled with the impact of tariffs, the performance of many automakers has sounded a red alert. The net profits of mainstream automakers such as Volkswagen Group, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Hyundai Motor, Kia, and General Motors have dropped by 20% to 60% year-on-year. Stellantis Group, Nissan, Renault, Ford, and Volvo Cars have even suffered losses.  01 German Brands See Collective Plunge in Profits   First of all, it is worth noting that the "Big Three" of the German automotive industry have all suffered a sharp drop in profits, with none survive. Volkswagen Group's financial report shows that in the first half of 2025, its revenue was 158.4 billion euros, a slight year-on-year decrease of 0.3%; operating profit plummeted by 33%, dropping sharply from 10 billion euros in the same period last year to 6.7 billion euros. Among them, the loss caused by tariffs alone reached 1.3 billion euros.   Currently, Volkswagen Group is facing pressure in major markets. In the United States, the tariff policy of the Trump administration is eroding the revenue and profits of the Audi and Porsche brands, which rely on imports. In Europe, weak market demand and high production costs are also putting pressure on Volkswagen Group's profits. In China, consumers are increasingly inclined to domestic brands, and Volkswagen Group is losing market share. For this reason, Volkswagen Group has lowered its full-year performance outlook. Mercedes-Benz Group's profits have also been diluted by tariffs, especially in the second quarter, with revenue falling 9.8% year-on-year to 33.153 billion euros; net profit was 957 million euros, a sharp year-on-year drop of 68.7%, making it the worst single-quarter performance in nearly four years. Affected by the second-quarter results, the first-half results also fell sharply, with revenue down 8.6% year-on-year to 66.377 billion euros; net profit down 55.8% year-on-year to 2.688 billion euros.     In response, Mercedes-Benz Group believes that the main reasons include: a decline in vehicle deliveries, weak pricing, negative exchange rate impacts, and reduced contributions from joint ventures. The company also stated that due to tariffs hitting car sales, it expects full-year 2025 revenue to be significantly lower than last year. BMW Group also turned to a decline, but the drop was slightly smaller than its two German counterparts. Data shows that in the first half of the year, its revenue fell 8% year-on-year to 67.685 billion euros; net profit was 4.015 billion euros, a year-on-year drop of 29%. However, BMW Group maintained its full-year 2025 financial forecast unchanged. In addition, the company said that its extensive manufacturing layout in the United States gives it an advantage over competitors, but tariffs still have an impact on BMW Group's financial performance, and Trump's separate tariffs on steel and aluminum have also had a broader impact on the entire automotive industry. Not long ago, the European Union and the United States reached an agreement that the United States will impose a new 15% tariff on cars imported from the EU, which is lower than the current 27.5%, but it still poses a major obstacle to the export-oriented business of European automakers. In addition, the EU's imposition of tariffs on Chinese-made pure electric vehicles has also brought challenges to some European automakers, such as BMW, which produces electric Mini models in China through a joint venture.   02 Tariffs Strike, Profits Evaporate  In addition to German automakers, Japanese and South Korean ones also cannot escape the impact. Among them, Hyundai Motor's revenue grew in the second quarter, but net profit fell 22% year-on-year to 3.25 trillion won (approximately 16.8 billion yuan). It is reported that U.S. tariffs caused the company a loss of 828 billion won (approximately 4.3 billion yuan) in this quarter.     Kia Motors also achieved a record high in revenue in the quarter, but operating profit fell 24% year-on-year to 2.76 trillion won (approximately 14.3 billion yuan). It is said that the United States imposed a 25% tariff on imported cars starting from April, which directly caused Kia's operating profit to evaporate by 786 billion won (approximately 4.1 billion yuan) in the second quarter. This performance of a serious divergence between revenue and profit has exposed the impact of U.S. tariff policies on the global automotive industry. On the Japanese side, Mitsubishi Motors' net profit in the second quarter was almost completely wiped out, plummeting from 29.5 billion yen (approximately 1.4 billion yuan) in the same period last year to almost zero. American automakers are also facing pressure. Take General Motors as an example. In the first half of the year, revenue increased slightly year-on-year, but net profit fell 21% year-on-year to 4.68 billion U.S. dollars. Especially in the second quarter, net profit was 1.895 billion U.S. dollars, a year-on-year drop of 35.4%. General Motors expects the impact of tariffs to intensify in the third quarter and maintains its previous estimate that trade headwinds could cost the company 4 billion to 5 billion U.S. dollars in profits.   03 Many Fall into the Quagmire of Losses   Of course, it is unfair to attribute all the troubles entirely to tariffs. For automakers such as Nissan and Stellantis, for example, their operations had already shown a downward trend before the tariffs took effect, and the tariffs exacerbated their difficulties. There are not just one or two companies that have suffered losses. Specifically, in the first half of this year, Stellantis Group handed over an extremely dismal 成绩单，with a net loss of up to 2.256 billion euros, compared with a net profit of 5.647 billion euros in the same period last year, turning from profit to loss. The North American and European markets became a drag. Non-recurring expenses also exacerbated the loss. In the first half of the year, the group set aside several special project expenses, including the termination of fuel cell projects, platform impairment, emission fines, etc., totaling 3.2 billion euros. Facing multiple challenges, under the leadership of new CEO Antonio Filosa, who took office on June 23, Stellantis plans to gradually repair the company's performance in the second half of the year, and the profit margin is expected to return to the "low single-digit" range.   In contrast, Nissan's loss was expected in the industry. Following a net loss of 670.9 billion yen (approximately 32.6 billion yuan) in the 2024 fiscal year (April 2024 - March 2025), Nissan once again reported a net loss of 11.58 billion yen (approximately 5.6 billion yuan) in the second quarter of this year. Nissan said that the dual impact of exchange rate fluctuations and U.S. tariff policies led to the loss. Currently, under the leadership of new President Ivan Espinosa, who took office on April 1, Nissan is launching a global self-rescue, with specific measures including laying off 20,000 employees, closing 7 factories, and promoting R&D and supply chain innovation. It is worth mentioning that Nissan's loss has dragged down its alliance partner Renault. In the first half of this year, Renault Group's revenue was 27.6 billion euros, a year-on-year increase of 2.5%; the operating profit margin dropped from 8.1% in the same period last year to 6%; the net loss was 11.143 billion euros, of which the impairment of Nissan's equity investment alone recorded a loss of 9.3 billion euros. In addition, even excluding the factor of Nissan's equity write-down, Renault Group's net profit in the first half of the year was only 461 million euros, less than one-third of the same period last year (1.469 billion euros). However, Renault Group's new CEO François Provost took office on July 31, and it is expected that the company's profit margin will return to last year's level in the second half of the year. There are two other automakers that suffered losses: Ford and Volvo Cars. The former reported a net loss of 36 million U.S. dollars in the second quarter, mainly due to recall costs and 800 million U.S. dollars in negative impacts from tariffs. The latter recorded an operating loss of 10 billion Swedish kronor (approximately 7.4 billion yuan) in the second quarter. Volvo is also considered one of the European automakers most severely affected by U.S. tariffs. It can be seen that in the first half of 2025, the giants of the global automotive industry collectively encountered a cold wave in performance. The impact of tariff policies is like a domino effect, triggering chain reactions in major markets. Coupled with multiple factors such as weak market demand, intensified competition, and enterprises' own operational adjustments, whether it is European, Japanese-Korean, or American automakers, they generally face the severe challenge of declining profits or even losses. Many companies have launched self-rescue measures by changing their leaders, adjusting strategies, and reducing costs, trying to reverse the decline. In this case, the pace of industry reshuffle and transformation may further accelerate.

On July 4, 2025, local time, U.S. President Donald Trump signed the "One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB)" at the White House. This marks a fundamental shift in U.S. economic and national security policies at the ideological level, representing a carefully designed strategic redistribution of national resources and policy priorities. Funds and policy support are systematically being shifted from areas such as green energy, social welfare, and higher education to national defense, border security, and fossil fuel production. The bill systematically repeals or cuts a large number of green energy programs established during the IRA era, including the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, tax credits for clean heavy-duty vehicles, low-emission power plans, and numerous clean energy tax credits for individuals and businesses. At the same time, it injects huge new allocations into the fields of national defense, traditional fossil fuel extraction, and homeland security. In the name of "America First," Trump has completely discarded Biden's clean energy legacy—terminating electric vehicle tax credits seven years early while issuing a $157 billion subsidy check to fossil fuels. The bill is seen as a "sharp U-turn" in U.S. new energy vehicle policies, and Automotive Business Review believes that this will trigger a major shock in the global automotive industry.   A One-Vote Margin Rewrites Political and Economic Policies The "One Big Beautiful Bill" is a landmark legislative agenda introduced by Trump after returning to the White House in early 2025, with core provisions aimed at reducing corporate taxes and reshaping economic incentives through tax policies. For example, it makes the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) permanent, including individual income tax rates, higher standard deductions, and higher exemptions for estate and gift taxes. It also permanently extends the 20% tax deduction for Qualified Business Income (QBI), which is increased to 23% in the bill. The bill also introduces several new tax incentives designed to directly increase household disposable income and stimulate consumer demand. These measures include tax deductions for qualified tips and overtime pay, enhanced standard deductions for the elderly, and tax exemptions for car loan interest under certain restrictions. To encourage corporate capital investment, the bill extends the 100% bonus depreciation policy until 2030 and suspends the amortization requirement for domestic research and development expenditures, effectively restoring the immediate expensing of these costs. In addition, it extends the rule that caps business interest deductions based on EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). On May 22 this year, the House of Representatives passed the initial version by a one-vote margin; on July 1, after intense debate in the Senate, the vote was tied 50-50, and U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance cast the crucial tie-breaking vote; on July 3, the House of Representatives passed it in a second vote; finally, on July 4, Independence Day, Trump personally signed it into law. The nearly 900-page bill combines large-scale, permanent tax cuts with massive, upfront government spending, with its funding entirely dependent on new debt. The New York Times pointed out that this bill puts the United States on a new and more dangerous fiscal path. Preliminary analysis shows that the bill will increase the U.S. deficit by approximately $3.3 trillion over the next decade and reduce national tax revenues over decades. This gap may cause a drastic change in the U.S. fiscal trajectory and exacerbate concerns about a debt crisis. Of course, the bill is not just a domestic economic policy. By investing huge resources in the military and key domestic industries, it clearly implements the "great power competition" strategy with China. Provisions in the bill restricting the use of components from "prohibited foreign entities" or "foreign entities of concern" in clean energy and defense supply chains are aimed at promoting decoupling of key industries from China. At the same time, it instrumentalizes tax and trade policies, marking a new stage in Sino-U.S. economic games. Currently, the bill has entered the implementation preparation stage. The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service are formulating detailed rules, with specific operational guidelines expected to be released in phases starting from August; professionals predict that the first batch of car loan interest deduction applications will be available in the 2026 tax season.   Disrupting the U.S. Automotive Industry   Under the influence of the "One Big Beautiful Bill," the U.S. automotive industry, the world's second-largest car market, will be affected in several ways. Firstly, the U.S. will eliminate the $7,500 new car tax credit. The bill stipulates that starting from September 30, 2025, the federal tax credit of $7,500 for the purchase of new electric vehicles will be completely canceled. This policy is terminated seven years earlier than originally planned (end of 2032), directly reducing consumers' economic incentive to buy electric vehicles. In fact, not only will new energy vehicle-related tax credits be terminated, the bill also cancels tax credits for used vehicles (up to $4,000) and commercial vehicles (up to $40,000). Secondly, a new electric vehicle registration fee is added: $250 for new cars and $100 for hybrid cars. This policy directly impacts market segments highly dependent on subsidies. Nominally aimed at filling the "highway fund gap," it actually suppresses demand for electric vehicles through cost transfer. This change will, on the one hand, hit emerging electric vehicle players, as car companies relying on federal subsidies will face increased costs; on the other hand, it will boost traditional fuel vehicles. Under the dual effects of loan interest deduction incentives and additional fees for electric vehicles, the competitiveness of fuel vehicles will rebound in the short term. In 2024, electric vehicles accounted for only 8% of U.S. car sales, with models such as Tesla Model 3 and Model Y in the $30,000-$60,000 price range highly dependent on subsidies. According to Barclays Bank's forecast, there may be a "electric summer" rush to buy in the short term, but sales will plummet by more than 20% after October. It is worth noting that the "cooling down" in the new energy sector is not limited to the automotive industry. The bill also terminates a number of clean energy tax credits, including those for new energy-efficient homes, energy-efficient home renovations, household renewable energy equipment, and clean hydrogen production credits. In simple terms, it is a blow to clean energy, making the traditional energy industry the biggest winner. In response, Elon Musk sharply criticized, "The bill retains provisions to cut incentives for new energy vehicles and photovoltaics, but spares oil and gas subsidies." In addition, the bill proposes that the maximum interest on new car loans is $10,000, with annual deductions. The bill allows buyers of new cars purchased and assembled in the U.S. between 2025 and 2028 to deduct up to $10,000 in annual car loan interest expenses. The deduction threshold decreases progressively with income, with single filers earning over $100,000 (or joint filers over $200,000) phased out. The purpose of this measure is, on the one hand, to stimulate domestic demand and ease the pressure of car purchases under high loan interest rates; on the other hand, to drive local production, limited to "U.S.-assembled" vehicles. Foreign companies need to accelerate localized layout to enjoy this benefit. Of course, this clearly benefits fuel vehicles, as electric vehicle loan terms are generally shorter, further widening the cost gap between the two types of vehicles due to differences in the duration of deduction benefits.   A New Stage for the Global Auto Market   As the "One Big Beautiful Bill" enters the implementation phase, its impact is not limited to U.S. borders, and the global automotive industry will enter a new stage. From the perspective of car companies, traditional car companies and new energy car companies will face completely different fates. Overall, the new energy market pattern may be reset. The cancellation of subsidies and the increase in additional fees will squeeze the profits of electric vehicle brands that previously relied on subsidies to gain market share. However, in the medium to long term, traditional fuel vehicles and plug-in hybrid models will usher in a short golden period during the transition, which may delay the overall electrification process. According to expert predictions, Tesla plans to cut prices by 5%-8% to absorb the impact through its scale advantages, but its profit margin may be compressed to below 15%. Startups highly dependent on subsidies, such as Rivian and Lucid, face financing difficulties and a sharp increase in the risk of cash flow 断裂. Traditional car companies such as Ford and General Motors may reduce electric pickup truck production capacity and shift to hybrid models. A recent report released by BloombergNEF (BNEF) shows that the U.S. electric vehicle penetration rate will lag behind the global average by 2040 and be squeezed out of the world's top three electric vehicle markets. The agency's report last year predicted that the proportion of U.S. electric vehicle sales would exceed the global average starting from 2029. In terms of the global supply chain, the trend of regionalization is intensifying. The U.S. is trying to force enterprises to enhance their independent capabilities through "depolicyization," but links such as battery raw material processing, motor and electronic control still rely on imports. Car companies from many countries, facing the threat of U.S. tariffs, may be forced to set up factories in the U.S. Currently, South Korea's Hyundai, Nissan, and others have announced investments to expand production in the U.S. to maintain their "U.S.-assembled" label qualification.   The "One Big Beautiful Bill" has sparked intense debate since its introduction. Supporters believe that at a time of slowing economic growth, it provides benefits to the middle class and breathing space for traditional car companies; opponents argue that it exacerbates the fiscal deficit and stifles the clean energy transition. John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, publicly stated that the "double-edged sword" of loan interest deductions and tariff exemptions can boost short-term sales, but enterprises still need to pay greater costs and time in localizing investment and increasing production capacity. But he also pointed out that the electric vehicle tax credit will jeopardize their collective goal of achieving 40%-50% electric vehicle sales by 2030. Overall, most views believe that there are both advantages and disadvantages: in the short term, it injects vitality into consumers and traditional car companies, but in the medium and long term, it brings dual tests to fiscal sustainability and environmental goals. Regardless, the "One Big Beautiful Bill" will become a milestone in the global automotive industry in 2025.

  3,000 Chinese cars burned for 20 days and finally sank into the Pacific Ocean. The blazing flames could not stop the trend of going to sea, but burned even more. From January to May, China exported 2.83 million cars, an increase of 16% year-on-year. In Europe, Chinese cars have doubled their market share; in Russia, they have gone to great lengths to gain more market share; and in South East Asia, the form of factory building is all the rage. Rapid growth has already caused anxiety among foreigners, just like the price war that has arisen at home, where Chinese cars are both ice and fire overseas.   According to foreign media reports, a cargo ship loaded with 3,000 Chinese cars from Yantai, China, has been bound for Lazaro Cárdenas Port in Mexico since the end of May. The journey was supposed to take more than half a month, but it suddenly caught fire halfway, and 3,000 cars burned for 20 days before finally sinking to the bottom of the Pacific Ocean.  The fire in the sky drove away the enthusiasm that could not go to sea. According to the data of the Passenger Federation, the top ten countries in China's total automobile exports from January to May this year, Mexico was far ahead with 239,709 vehicles, followed by the United Arab Emirates, Russia, Brazil, Belgium, Australia, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, the Philippines, and Turkey. Mexico accounts for a sufficient share of Chinese cars going overseas, but Mexico is not the future of Chinese cars going overseas. In terms of China's total exports of new energy vehicles from January to May, Belgium leads, followed by Brazil, followed by Mexico.  What makes Europeans anxious is that the 28 European markets sold more than 1.10 million new cars in May, an increase of 2.5% year-on-year; among them, the pure electric vehicle market sold 194,300 cars in May, an increase of 28% year-on-year, and the plug-in hybrid car market sold 108,900 cars in May, an increase of 31% year-on-year. In May, Chinese automakers registered 65,800 vehicles in Europe, with a market share of 5.9%, which has doubled from 2.9% in 2024. Behind this, the biggest credit is: new energy vehicles. It is reported that SAIC MG sold 29,400 cars in Europe in May, accounting for almost half of the share of Chinese automakers; another news shows that BYD will speed up the launch of new cars in Europe, with pure electric, plug-in mix, and occupy the market at "affordable" prices. Some institutions predict that BYD's sales in Europe will double this year.  Rushing overseas at the extreme speed, seizing the speed advantage, but hiding huge dangers. Just recently, a piece of news came from abroad - Russian media bombarded Chinese brands for "zero profit operation".  In the best of times, mutual respect; in the worst of times, mutual respect. Since the beginning of this year, the Russian auto market has experienced a "collapse". The cumulative sales volume in January-May 432,900, a year-on-year decrease of nearly 27%. The overall decline is mainly due to the fact that the sales of Chinese auto brands, which originally occupied a higher share, have continued to decline. The market is still there, consumers don't want to buy it, so lower the price and sell it again. Russian media reported that some distributors of Chinese brands operate at almost zero profit just to grab market share. "It really looks like an organised strategic move," said the manager of a large distribution group.  But interestingly, a compact pure electric car Kaiyi E5 was rolled off the production line at the AVTOTOR factory in Russia in February 2023, and is currently priced at 1.35 million rubles and about 123,700 yuan. This price is "unattainable" in the Chinese market, but it is accused of "dumping" in Russia.   However, each market has its own unique characteristics, and we need to respect the local customs and customs of our field.  Nezha, after all, can't change his life against the sky, the thunder is endless. China is busy moving and rectifying, and abroad, according to media reports, Thailand plans to adjust the subsidy rules for pure electric vehicle manufacturers. It is reported that the car subsidies in Thailand that Nezha Automobile previously enjoyed are very likely to be "spit out".  It is understood that according to the subsidy rules in Thailand, "the subsidized enterprises need to make a commitment to produce 1.5 pure electric vehicles in Thailand for every electric vehicle imported". If the car companies participating in the subsidy fail to comply with the subsidy conditions, they need to repay the subsidy - Nezha car production fails to meet the standard, and the subsidy needs to be repaid up to 2 billion baht. 2 billion baht is equivalent to RMB, about: 440 million yuan.  It is worth noting that "Paopoom Rojanasakul, Deputy Minister of Finance of Thailand, confirmed that in view of the current situation of Nezha automobiles, the Thai Ministry of Finance has asked the National Electric Vehicle Policy Committee to amend relevant regulations", which means that the Nezha automobile explosion has dragged down the entire Chinese automobile industry in Thailand. Every car company fights alone, but in the eyes of outsiders, we are a team. Rewards are fair to every member of the team; punishment is also fair to every member of the team  We should have looked twice at going overseas. In the past, Chinese automakers favored going overseas, and there were many people who made up for it. It was difficult to make a difference in China. Therefore, selling vehicles overseas solved the problem of production capacity and slow sales. This situation continues to this day. Nowadays, the market of every country is improving with the passage of time, and it is obvious that overcharging the numbers cannot last any longer. Relying on true technology and high-quality products to go overseas is king. Chinese cars go to sea to interpret the two heavens of ice and fire, nothing more than the essence has not changed. In foreign countries, the benefits are enjoyed by yourself, and the sky falls and others carry it, but there is no such good thing.

  According to two people familiar with the matter, Stellantis, the world's fourth-largest automaker, is considering various options, including a possible sale of its troubled luxury brand Maserati, in an effort to streamline its sprawling product line that encompasses 14 brands.   These discussions about Maserati's future began long before Stellantis' new CEO Antonio Filosa took over, when the group was helmed by Chairperson John Elkann.   One of Mr. Elkann's top priorities in selecting a new CEO candidate was the viability of the Franco-Italian joint venture's 14 brands, including Chrysler, Peugeot, Jeep and Alpha Coefficient Romeo.   In early April, Stellantis hired McKinsey, a consultancy, to analyse the impact of US tariffs on Maserati and alpha coefficient Romeo and assess their future strategies. Stellantis said at the time that it was "fully committed to both brands". However, two sources told Reuters that one of the options McKinsey is evaluating for Stellantis includes divesting its only luxury brand, Maserati, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. One of the people said Stellantis was gradually realising that it had too many brands, making it difficult to devote sufficient resources to each one. "The company needs to'set priorities'," the person said. A second source said that while Stellantis had not authorised McKinsey to find a buyer for Maserati, its advisers were tasked with assessing "all possible options", including a potential sale, saying anything was possible. A Stellantis spokesperson said: "Maserati is not for sale with all due respect." McKinsey declined to comment.   According to another source, opinions are divided within the Stellantis board about Maserati's future. Some board members believe that the company does not currently have the resources and capabilities to successfully rebuild Maserati and should therefore consider selling it, while others believe that Maserati still has value and that selling the only luxury brand would be a major blow to Stellantis' reputation. Reuters said in a report that Chinese automakers may be interested in acquiring European car brands to accelerate their expansion in the European market, as these brands still lack consumer brand recognition in the region. This would be similar to SAIC's acquisition of MG in 2007 or Geely's acquisition of Volvo in 2010.   Maserati is facing brand scrutiny at a time when it is trying to tackle a series of major industry challenges. Chinese brands are eating away at European market share with their affordable, technology-leading products. Stellantis, like other European carmakers, is grappling with the steep import tariffs recently imposed by US President Donald Trump, which have had a particular impact on high-priced brands like Maserati that rely heavily on imports and sell relatively small volumes. Unlike Stellantis' Dodge, Jeep, and Chrysler brands, all Maserati models in the U.S. market are imported from Italy and do not have a localized production base in North America. The news is not the first time Maserati has been rumored to be up for sale. Natalie Knight, Stellantis' former chief financial officer, suggested last year that the Trident-branded brand might exit the 14-brand car group, but the claim was later denied.   The former chief executive of Stellantis resigned in December over the company's poor performance in the US market, and he refused to sell any brands during his tenure. Before his resignation, Mr. Tang had said Maserati's problems were not with the product itself. He blamed poor marketing and unclear brand positioning. But some investors and analysts believe that streamlining the brand portfolio would help improve Stellantis' profit margins. Stellantis shares have lost two-thirds of their value since March. Maserati CEO Santo Ficili said this month that a brand revitalization plan will be officially launched after new CEO Antonio Filosa takes over on June 23. In an interview with Reuters on June 5, he not only denied rumours that Stellantis would sell Maserati, but also expressed optimism about the future of the brand, saying Filosa would support plans, including the launch of a new model. "We have a clear idea of the future direction and hope to be ready as soon as possible," he said. "Let's wait until Antonio officially takes over and see what the next step is."   Maserati's performance has been lackluster. Santo Fichli says about 35-40 per cent of its customers come from the US. In 2024, Maserati's sales fell by more than half year-on-year, selling just 11,300 cars, of which 4,819 were sold in the US, and recording an adjusted operating loss of €260 million for the year. The outlook for 2025 is also not optimistic. As of March, the Italian high-end brand's sales have fallen by 48% compared to the first three months of 2024. The brand has no plans to launch a new model, as its last round of business development planning has been halted by Stellantis. In an earnings call in February, Stellantis CFO Doug Ostermann confirmed that the 1.50 billion euro investment in Maserati had been written off. This will result in "certain projects being cancelled prior to launch," according to financial documents. Although no specific details of these projects have been released, according to foreign media "Autocar", the cancelled projects are expected to include the multi-promised pure electric MC20 Folgore. At the time, Mr. Ostermann said the group needed to reassess the timetable for the launch of Maserati products. "We must recognise the market dynamics of the business, particularly in China, and our expectations for the pace of the electrification transition in the luxury market," he said. Maserati has discontinued two of its best-selling models, the Ghibli and the Levante, but its replacements won't be available until 2028 and 2027, respectively, meaning that the Grecale, which costs about $80,000, is the only SUV left for Maserati today amid a continuing consumer trend toward SUVs.  Maserati also sells the Gran Turismo sports car and the MC20 supercar. However, both cars lack broad appeal and are not enough to support the survival of the entire brand. Last year, Tang Weishi, then CEO of Stellantis, admitted that Maserati was "in the red". While the launch of successor models from Geberit and Levante may help turn around the brand's sales and financial prospects, the luxury car market is fiercely competitive. Alpha coefficient Romeo, another Italian brand owned by Stellantis, is adjusting its product line so that it cannot launch products that are at odds with Maserati. That leaves both with limited room to grow.   For the coverage, some industry practitioners expressed their views on the matter.   He said that Stellantis' current difficulties actually reveal the deeper realities facing the entire automotive industry in terms of brand management, regional market dynamics, and manufacturing excellence. In the current competitive and economic climate, it is no longer sustainable to maintain 14 independent brands. Investors and analysts generally agree that a streamlined and integrated brand portfolio will enable Stellantis to focus investment, marketing and R & D resources on core brands, thereby enhancing profitability. Today's automotive economy has undergone a fundamental shift: only with a clear market position and sustainable profits can companies justify investing heavily in different design languages, marketing strategies, distribution networks and customer experiences. The brand presence is highly regional, creating both opportunity and complexity. Peugeot and Citroe ̈ n still dominate the French market, while Jeep and RAM have a strong presence in North America. By contrast, brands such as α coefficient Romeo, DS and Lancia have little to gain at the high end of Europe, a key market for the electrification transition. This geographic fragmentation of brand influence means that the traditional global unified brand strategy is no longer effective, and should be replaced by a regionally optimal strategy - leveraging local brand equity while achieving operational efficiency.   The spotlight on Maserati is a re-examination of Stellantis' entire portfolio optimisation. In the past, Maserati was essentially Chrysler with Ferrari engines, a reality that undermined the brand's luxury positioning. Tang Weishi, the former CEO, blamed Maserati's recent setbacks on a failed marketing strategy, but the root of the problem was a lack of operational capabilities. The future belongs to automakers that master advanced manufacturing processes and fast product development cycles. Sustainable competitive advantage comes from operational excellence, not brand sentiment. Stellantis' situation, he points out, is not just a case, but a harbinger of an industry-wide restructuring trend. As electrification and intelligence reshape the industry competition landscape, only those companies that can efficiently allocate resources and maintain market relevance can survive. Future success will depend on decisive strategic execution. Abandoning brand sentiment and turning to operational excellence, promoting localization, strategic cooperation, brand streamlining and engineering integration - these are the cornerstones of success in the automotive industry in the next decade.

On June 20, Reuters just reported that due to Maserati's operational difficulties, Stellantis, the world's fourth-largest automaker, is considering selling this luxury brand.   Insiders revealed that the future of Maserati had already been discussed before the appointment of the new CEO, Antonio Filosa, last month. At that time, the group was still under the leadership of the chairman, John Elkann.   Elkann is said to have made sustainability a priority for the French-Italian joint venture's 14 brands (including Chrysler, Peugeot, Jeep and α coefficient Romeo) when interviewing CEO candidates. Reuters pointed out that as the world's fourth largest automaker, Stellantis, along with other European automakers, is also facing high US import tariffs and is struggling in a fierce competition with Chinese automakers.   In early April this year, Stellantis hired McKinsey consultants to evaluate the impact of US tariffs on Maserati and alpha coefficient Romeo, at which time the group made a clear commitment to fully support the two brands.   Sources told Reuters that among the plans currently provided by McKinsey to Stellantis, there is a potential option to sell Maserati, its only luxury brand. However, the evaluation work is still in the early stages, and it is uncertain whether this sales plan can be successfully implemented.   In response to this matter, a Stellantis spokesperson told Reuters, "It needs to be clarified that Maserati is not for sale"; McKinsey declined to comment.   The former CEO, Carlos Tavares, resigned in December last year due to poor performance in the US market. He had refused to consider selling any of the group's brands. However, some investors and analysts believe that streamlining brands will help improve Stellantis' profit margin. Since March last year, the company's share price has fallen by two-thirds, and investors are suffering.  According to the data, Maserati's sales in 2024 halved to 11,300 units, and the brand's adjusted operating loss last year reached 260 million euros. Due to the suspension of the original business plan last year, the brand has no new model launch plans at present, and it needs to wait for Filosa to announce the new plan after taking office.   The source said Stellantis had recognised the difficulties of having too many brands to make quotas difficult. "Car companies need to establish priorities." Another person added that McKinsey, while not mandated to specifically find Maserati buyers, was tasked with evaluating all options, including a sale.   Regarding the sale, sources said that the Stellantis board was divided: some members believed that the group could not restart the brand and ensure sustainable development, and insisted that the sale was the best option; the other side argued that Maserati still has value, and the sale of the only luxury brand will seriously damage the group's reputation, and Stellantis' face must not be lost. Reuters believes that Chinese automakers such as Chery may be interested in acquiring these European car brands to enhance their local market expansion capabilities, similar to the case of SAIC Motor Group's acquisition of MG brand in 2007 or Geely's acquisition of Volvo Cars in 2010.

1. The current situation of sales decline: the global market "stall   As a benchmark company in the electric vehicle industry, Tesla is facing unprecedented market challenges. According to the latest data from the China Federation of Passengers, Tesla's wholesale sales in China in May were only 61,662 vehicles, down 15% year-on-year. This is the eighth consecutive month of sales decline. What's more serious is that this trend is spreading from the Chinese market to the world:   The European market is also not optimistic: the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Italy have all experienced cliff-like declines to varying degrees. Tesla showrooms that used to queue up for test drives are now crowded, and some stores even shorten business hours to cut costs.   US: Tesla's market share in California shrank seriously in the first quarter of this year. As its base, the decline in sales is of symbolic significance - not only reflects the erosion of market share, but also exposes the decline of brand appeal. 2. Analysis of the deeper reasons for the decline in sales (1) Product iteration lag: the main models enter the "end of life cycle"   Industry experts point out that Tesla's current product line structure is one of the core factors for the decline in sales. Model 3 and Model Y, as their sales pillars, have almost entered the end of the product lifecycle (usually the product cycle of electric vehicles is 5-7 years). Although Tesla maintains some competitiveness through software upgrades (such as FSD function iteration), the stagnation of innovation at the hardware level (such as cruising range, interior design, charging speed, etc.) has left consumers with aesthetic fatigue, and it is almost impossible to compete with domestic cars at the same price.   At the same time, new products such as Cybertruck have failed to carry the "growth flag". Since its delivery last year, Cybertruck has been unable to break into the market quickly due to slow production ramps, design disputes (high maintenance costs due to stainless steel bodies, icy charging ports, etc.) and high pricing (starting at more than $60,000). (2) Strategic center of gravity shift: Musk's "diversified" layout is controversial   Founder Elon Musk, who has poured so much energy into social media (the X platform) and space exploration (the SpaceX Starship program) in recent years, has been questioned by some investors for "neglecting the core business". For example, the X platform is losing hundreds of millions of dollars, while Tesla's R & D investment has fallen from 10% in previous years to 7%. This quota imbalance could lead to a slowdown in Tesla's progress in key areas such as intelligence (such as the iteration of the autonomous driving algorithm) and electrification (the new generation of 4680 battery capacity climbing).(3) Deteriorating competitive environment: Chinese automakers' "encirclement" and the rise of European local brands   The fierce competition in the Chinese market is particularly prominent. BYD relies on the full product matrix of "Dynasty Series + Ocean Series" (sales exceeded 330,000 in May, of which new energy vehicles accounted for more than 90%), Huawei asks the world to rely on the advantages of intelligent cockpit technology (Hongmeng car machine system users exceed 2 million), NIO/Xiaopeng and other new forces in the high-end market precision positioning (such as NIO ET7 power exchange mode), continue to squeeze Tesla's market share, not only Tesla, BBA also have the same experience, the younger generation of domestic consumers seem to have lost interest in overseas brands.   The European market is facing a strong counterattack from local established automakers. The Volkswagen ID. series, BMW i series, and Mercedes-Benz EQ series have gradually replaced Tesla as the first choice for consumers with mature dealer networks, localized services (such as European consumers prioritize after-sales response speed), and policy support (European Union carbon tariff exemption). In the end, the model has not been updated for many years.3. Tesla's response strategy: layoffs and restructuring and the shrinking of Supercharger stations   Facing the difficult situation, Elon Musk has recently launched a series of emergency adjustments: suspending the global expansion of Supercharger stations. The original plan to add 10,000 new Supercharger stations worldwide has been put on hold, and instead, he is optimizing the layout of existing stations (such as increasing utilization rate and upgrading the charging power to 350kW). Although this measure may affect the user experience in the short term, it can reduce capital expenditures (the construction cost of a single Supercharger station is approximately $250,000). Moreover, the charging power of domestic Supercharger stations is basically above 500kW. The gap really makes people hold their breath.    Large-scale layoffs and restructuring, focusing on adjusting sales, administration and other departments. At the same time, some R & D resources are tilted towards autonomous driving (FSD V12 version iteration) and robot taxi projects, trying to reshape competitiveness through technological breakthroughs. This is still worth learning. Make full use of resources for business expansion and increase corporate vitality and development prospects. 4. Future Outlook: A Turning Point in a Crisis?Despite the severe current difficulties, Tesla still has the potential momentum for a "reversal" and a strong technological reserve advantage: If the 4680 battery (with a 50% increase in energy density and a 14% reduction in cost) achieves large - scale mass production, it will significantly enhance product competitiveness; if the FSD technology passes the US regulatory approval, it may disrupt the mobility service market. Brand premium ability: Tesla remains the most influential brand in the global electric vehicle field. Its combination of "tech - sense + direct - sales model" occupies a unique position in consumers' minds. Elon Musk is good at making disruptive decisions in a crisis, and may launch more competitive new products in the future (such as the rumored Model 2 compact car).Conclusion: Tesla's sales decline is not caused by a single factor, but a concentrated outbreak of multiple contradictions such as product iteration, strategic focus, and competitive environment. In the short term, layoffs and shrinking overcharging stations may further affect market confidence; but in the long run, if it can achieve breakthroughs in core technologies (batteries, autonomous driving) and user experience (charging network, after-sales services), Tesla may still return to glory.

  According to the foreign media "Autocar" magazine, Audi global CEO Autonavi (Gernot Döllner) said in an interview that Audi has reversed the decision to stop producing internal combustion engines in 2033 and will continue to produce gasoline vehicles until around 2035, or even longer. In addition, Autonavi (Gernot Döllner) also revealed that the A1 and Q2 will be eliminated and there will be no successor models, ensuring Audi's luxury positioning. In the future, the A3 and Q3 will become entry-level models, the A8 will be the flagship of the sedan series, and the Q7, Q8 and the rumored Q9 will be the top models of the SUV series. At the same time, Audi will also develop new electric vehicles, including the pure electric A3, which will be unveiled next year.In 2021, Audi announced that it would stop developing new fuel vehicles and would not launch new fuel vehicles after 2026. According to the news announced at that time, Audi will only launch new models with pure electric power in the global market in 2026, and stop producing new gasoline, diesel and hybrid vehicles, but new models launched before 2026 will continue to be produced and sold. By 2033, Audi will accelerate the transition to electrification, phase out the production of internal combustion engines, and achieve zero emissions by 2050 at the latest.  However, the CEO of Audi at the time was Markus Duesmann. Markus Duesmann officially became Chairperson and CEO of Audi on April 1, 2020. During his tenure, he led Audi's electric transformation strategy and promoted the company to respond to industry changes through measures such as layoffs. On June 29, 2023, Autonavi (Gernot Döllner) took over his position, effective September 1 of the same year.  In 2026, it is a big year for Audi products. A variety of replacement fuel vehicles will be launched, including the new Audi A5, the new Audi A6, the new Q7 and the new Q3. The Audi A5 is the replacement model of the Audi A4, including the Sportback coupe and the Avant wagon. The size of the new Audi A5 is further increased, and the power is equipped with a 2.0T engine and a 3.0T V6 engine. The latter will be carried on the performance version of the S5. The new Audi A6 will not be renamed A7, including the Avant wagon and sedan. It is based on the new fuel vehicle platform PPC, and has been upgraded in terms of exterior interior design and technology configuration. It is expected to be launched in 2026. The new Audi Q3 was officially launched on June 17. It is based on the MQB Evo platform and is the third generation of Audi Q3. The appearance adopts the latest family-style design style. The interior is a new dual-screen layout. In addition to providing gasoline/diesel engines, the power system also adds a plug-in hybrid system.   On February 28 this year, Audi's Brussels factory in Belgium officially announced the closure, and about 3,000 workers are expected to lose their jobs. Previously, foreign media reported that by 2029, Audi will cut up to 7,500 jobs in German administration and development. It is understood that Audi's layoffs plan is related to the Volkswagen Group's 1 billion euro cost reduction plan. Including the layoffs plan, the Volkswagen Group plans to lay off nearly 48,000 people, including Volkswagen 35,000, Porsche 3,900 people, and the software division Cariad about 1,600 people.

  While Chinese new energy vehicles are engaged in a fierce price war, it seems that the other side of the world is following a completely different script, as new energy vehicles are gradually being abandoned in the European and American markets. On June 18, Gernot Döllner, the global CEO of Audi, confirmed in an interview with the media that the plan formulated by the previous management has been overturned. Audi has withdrawn its original plan to stop developing and selling internal combustion engine vehicles in 2033, and currently no clear termination timeline is set. According to the original plan, Audi was to launch its last batch of fuel - powered vehicles globally in 2026 and achieve full electrification in 2033.European car companies collectively withdrawing from the pure electric marketFerrari, the absolute star brand of the fuel age, originally planned to unveil its first electric car in three phases starting in October this year, and finally make a global debut next spring, with the first customer deliveries scheduled for October 2026. But according to Reuters, due to the lack of demand for high-performance luxury electric models, Ferrari's second pure electric vehicle originally planned for 2026 has been delayed until 2028 at the earliest. This is the second time Ferrari has delayed the launch of this pure electric model. It was initially delayed by a year, and now it will wait until 2028 at the earliest. According to insiders, the delay is mainly due to Ferrari's internal belief that the current demand for high-performance electric vehicles is "zero".In addition to Audi and Ferrari, several multinational carmakers have become more pragmatic about the transition to electrification. Mercedes-Benz announced early last year that it would abandon its all-electric plan, saying it would no longer adhere to its original goal of making a full switch to electric vehicle sales in major markets by 2030. Volvo has since said it has abandoned its goal of selling only pure electric vehicles by 2030. Due to changing market conditions and lower-than-expected customer demand, Volvo has adjusted its electrification target to plug-in hybrid and battery-only models account for at least 90% of its sales by 2030.In February this year, Audi's manufacturing plant in Forest, Brussels was officially closed. This decision will lead to 3,000 people losing their jobs and has caused quite a stir in Belgium and Europe. This is an old factory with a history of 76 years. It has witnessed the glory of the fuel vehicle era of Volkswagen and its Audi brand, and has also experienced the hardships of the company's electrification transformation. Due to issues such as poor sales of pure electric models mainly produced like the Q8 e-tron, serious overcapacity, and high production costs, Audi had to consider closing this factory. What makes pure electric cars difficult in Europe and the United States?In Europe, high vehicle prices, long range and immature charging facilities are the core elements that deter buyers of electric vehicles. Charging infrastructure is a tricky topic that requires a lot of public and private investment, and in Europe, public services, whether at the national or regional level, are not the top priority. Data show that 70% of public charging stations in the European Union are concentrated in Germany, France and the Netherlands. The decline in demand for electric vehicles in Europe has led to a series of negative feedback, which carmakers do not want to see.In Europe, high vehicle prices, long range and immature charging facilities are the core elements that deter buyers of electric vehicles. Charging infrastructure is a tricky topic that requires a lot of public and private investment, and in Europe, public services, whether at the national or regional level, are not the top priority. Data show that 70% of public charging stations in the European Union are concentrated in Germany, France and the Netherlands. The decline in demand for electric vehicles in Europe has led to a series of negative feedback, which carmakers do not want to see.The survey highlights a significant increase in confidence among existing EV motorists. Six in 10 (61%) EV motorists worldwide say they are less worried about running out of power compared to a year ago, and nearly three quarters (72%) say the choice and availability of public charging points has improved. However, the study also found that interest in EVs among fuel vehicle motorists is declining. In the United States, this interest has decreased slightly (31% in 2025 and 34% in 2024), while in Europe it has declined even more significantly (41% in 2025 and 48% in 2024).In response to this change in market demand, companies such as Ford, Renault, Kia, Hyundai, Porsche and Stellantis have adjusted their strategies, shifting their focus from R & D and production of pure electric vehicles to the development of hybrid systems, viewing this as a transitional technology. According to the forecast, the global FHEV market is expected to grow year by year, reaching a peak growth of 10.5% in 2030. This forecast indicates that hybrid vehicles will continue to play an important role in the coming period, especially in the context of cost and market acceptance challenges for pure electric vehicles.Mixing may be the optimal solution   The rise of China's new energy vehicles is essentially a dimensionality reduction blow to the industrial chain. Take BYD as an example, its sales volume in 2023 exceeded 3 million vehicles, surpassing Tesla to become the world's first. Behind it is the layout of the entire industrial chain: from lithium mining (such as Ganfeng Lithium Industry), battery manufacturing (BYD blade battery), to vehicle production, the cost is compressed to a level that European and American car companies cannot match. In the face of China's offensive, Europe and the United States choose "policy to build a wall". In 2024, the United States raised tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles from 25% to 100%, the European Union imposed 45% tariffs, and launched a "countervailing investigation", accusing Chinese car companies of relying on government subsidies for "unfair competition". This strategy of "blocking if you can't beat it" is actually to buy time for local car companies to transform. In the context of the European Union wielding a tariff stick on Chinese pure electric vehicles, Chinese automakers are "surging" in the European market with plug-in hybrid electric (PHEV) models as a breakthrough. Recently, preliminary data released by market analysis firm Dataforce shows that in Quarter 1, 2025, Chinese car sales in the European market reached 148,000 units, an increase of 78% year-on-year, and the market share jumped from 2.5% in the same period last year to 4.5%. Among them, the sales of plug-in hybrid models surged by 368% year-on-year, becoming the core engine driving growth.However, it is worth noting that Chinese plug - in hybrid vehicles still apply a 10% basic tariff in Europe. This policy difference has become a "breakthrough point" for Chinese automakers. Facing tariff pressure, Chinese automakers are adjusting their strategies in the European market and gaining market sales by launching plug - in hybrid models. Among the electric vehicles sold by BYD in the EU in March this year, the proportion of plug - in hybrid models has reached 41%, while that of SAIC Motor is as high as 49%. Although the sales volume of the Chery brand in the EU market is relatively small, the sales volume of its plug - in hybrid models has exceeded that of pure electric models. Among the electric vehicles sold in the EU in March, the proportion of plug - in hybrid models is as high as 71%.The "strategic withdrawal" of European and American car companies is actually a helpless choice under the global competition. When BYD raced at the speed of "27 patents per working day", when Chinese trams captured the European market at the "cabbage price", the outcome of the war was already doomed: either transformation or death. As Musk said: "If there is no Tesla in the United States, the electric car market will be dominated by China." And today, even with Tesla, this prediction is becoming a reality.

Information Summary Volkswagen makes its debut of the L4 - level self - driving vehicle ID.Buzz AD, which will be commercially available in Europe and America in 2026. The B2B model directly supplies the fleet, and signs 10,000 orders with Uber to reduce operating costs. Billions of euros have been invested heavily, with the goal of producing 100,000 vehicles annually, and the profit margin is expected to reach double digits. In 2035, the global autonomous driving market may exceed 450 billion euros, and Europe faces regulatory challenges. Main Text Volkswagen Group launched its first fully autonomous driving mass - produced model, the ID.Buzz AD, globally in Hamburg on Tuesday evening, marking the group's official entry into the core battlefield of future mobility. According to the plan, this autonomous driving taxi will be put into commercial operation in the European and US markets starting from 2026. As a strategic transformation move of the Wolfsburg - based automotive giant, Volkswagen is investing billions of euros to lay out a new business model. Oliver Blume, the Chief Executive Officer, declared at the launch event: "This move will push Volkswagen to rank among the leaders in the global hundred - billion - euro growth market." The strategic timing of this launch is quite meaningful: Just a few days before Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that he would release an autonomous driving taxi at the end of this week, Volkswagen took the lead in launching a solution with mass - production maturity. The prototype successfully dealt with complex scenarios such as being blocked by freight trucks, construction sections, and narrow - road intersections during a 20 - minute urban road test. Although the safety driver made two preparatory interventions (mainly for lane - changing operations), there was no need for manual takeover throughout the process. The core of Volkswagen's autonomous driving technology comes from Mobileye, which provides Volkswagen with the sensor system, artificial intelligence software, and the safety architecture of the software. The whole vehicle is equipped with a total of 27 sensors (including radar, lidar, and cameras), and multi - frequency band devices jointly build the vehicle's environmental perception system. It is expected that after obtaining mass - production certifications in the EU and the US by the end of 2026, the model will start production at the Hanover factory in Germany - with a limited initial production capacity. 01 Achieve level 4 autonomous driving According to the company's statement, the ID.Buzz AD has reached the "Level 4 Autonomous Driving (L4)" standard. That is, within a restricted driving range, the control software can manage the entire driving process, and in principle, there is no need for the driver to actively control the steering wheel. Although the vehicle retains the steering wheel and pedals, theoretically, there is no need to use them. Unlike Tesla or Waymo, Volkswagen mainly focuses on the business - to - business (B2B) model for enterprise customers. In the future, Volkswagen will directly deliver vehicles with complete solutions to fleet operators. The possible service package will cover the entire process of unmanned fleet operations, including route reservation, fleet management, and maintenance. The initial agreement reached between Volkswagen and Uber involves more than 10,000 driverless cars, mainly focusing on the North American market. In Europe, Volkswagen is seeking to establish similar cooperation with transportation alliances. Uber is also pursuing a similar strategy. It announced a week ago that the company has partnered with the British startup Wayve and plans to launch an autonomous driving service in the UK in 2026. Andrew MacDonald, Uber's Chief Operating Officer, said: "Autonomous driving should become a safe and reliable travel option for passengers worldwide." At present, the company is conducting tests with a number of technology partners. The goal is to produce hundreds of thousands of vehicles per year Alex Koster, Managing Director at Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in Zurich, analyzed and pointed out: “After an initial boom and a subsequent cooling - off period, the autonomous driving taxi sector is entering a track of steady growth.” According to BCG's forecast, by 2035, there will be 30 to 80 cities worldwide operating large - scale autonomous driving taxi fleets, most of which will be in the United States and China. The European market has its own special challenges: Issues such as regulatory differences, diverse transportation systems, and dense public transportation networks form barriers to the promotion of autonomous driving. Koster emphasized: “Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the thinking of an integrated model.” Christian Senger, Head of Volkswagen's Autonomous Driving Business, put forward the goal of “exponential growth” — to achieve an annual production of tens of thousands of vehicles in the medium term and build a fleet of “six - digit scale” in the long term. Senger has not yet revealed the specific price of this autonomous driving electric bus. If the strategy works, the growth of autonomous driving buses may save the rather lackluster ID.Buzz model. In 2024, the European sales volume of this model was about 28,000 units, basically the same as the previous year. Volkswagen invests heavily The heavy investment in entering the autonomous taxi sector poses significant financial challenges for Volkswagen. According to internal group sources, the company has so far invested billions of euros in R&D of autonomous driving systems and manufacturing of related components. This does not include the $2.6 billion investment made in 2019 to Argo AI, the now-defunct Ford subsidiary. Comparing horizontally across the industry, Waymo, the autonomous driving unit under Google, has raised approximately $11 billion in cumulative financing over the years and is recognized as the global industry leader. Tesla, which is about to launch its autonomous taxi, will adopt a pure visual system and direct sales model. Volkswagen, however, pinpoints the B2B model to achieve stronger economies of scale and higher returns. Senger expects this business to deliver "significant double-digit" profit margins — in contrast, the traditional automotive business currently targets a profit margin of only 6% to 8%. Uber's quarterly driver spending reached $20 billion Volkswagen's core value proposition to customers like Uber is that autonomous vehicles can significantly reduce the operational costs of large fleets—higher vehicle utilization, charging schedules unconstrained by driver rest periods, and flexible dispatching based on electricity prices and market demand. What Volkswagen leaves unsaid is that for platforms like Uber, the Wolfsburg-based automaker's new business model could eliminate their single largest expense: driver salaries, which account for nearly half of the platform's total expenditure. Volkswagen is well aware of the operational and financial challenges in autonomous driving. Previously, the company tested its Moia autonomous fleet in Hamburg and Hanover, with around 100 vehicles accumulatively driving over 600,000 kilometers. According to insiders, the project incurred annual losses of tens of millions of euros, "which is the main reason Moia didn't expand to more cities." Volkswagen is willing to absorb these losses, viewing the Moia project as a stepping stone to selling comprehensive service packages to fleet operators in the future.   Koster identified the root cause behind Moia's stagnation: "These vehicles have to be recorded on the balance sheet." As a result, Moia has transformed into a testing platform for technology and operations rather than an independent service provider. Through this approach, Volkswagen aims to lay the foundation for expanding its autonomous fleet business in Europe. Consulting firms generally recognize the immense potential of this market: According to McKinsey, the current market size of autonomous driving services in Europe and the United States is less than 100 million euros, but it is expected to exceed 450 billion euros by 2035, indicating significant medium-term growth potential.

  The report by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) shows that China leads the global zero - emission vehicle (ZEV) market and has outstanding performance in the field of electric vehicles. Nowadays, China's annual sales of electric vehicles exceed 11 million, accounting for more than half of the global total. This achievement is attributed to the strong domestic market demand and the precise export policies of Chinese manufacturers. This year, the monthly sales of electric vehicles exceeded 1 million for the first time.  Chinese carmakers occupy the top five in terms of coverage of zero-emission vehicle categories and five of the top six in terms of the share of electric vehicle sales, according to ICCT data. Geely, SAIC and other companies account for 50% of electric vehicle sales, achieving the original 2025 target a year ahead of schedule. In 2024, BYD's global pure electric vehicle sales surpassed Tesla for the first time. The sales of pure electric vehicles increased by 25% year-on-year, and the combined sales of pure electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles increased by 47% year-on-year.   BYD and Tesla are both included in the "leader" category of the ICCT rating system. As Chinese carmakers expand in global markets, other leading global carmakers are under urgent pressure to accelerate their transformation or risk losing their competitive advantage, according to the president of ICCT.

On the evening of June 10, Toyota Motor and Daimler Truck announced the finalization of an agreement to complete the merger between Toyota's Hino Motors and Daimler Truck's Mitsubishi Fuso Truck and Bus Corporation by April 2026. As planned, the two sides will jointly establish a new holding company, which is set to pursue a main-board listing on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The merger of these two giants is expected to impact the competitive landscape of Japan's commercial vehicle sector.The fraud scandal behind the merger of giants  Currently, Toyota holds a 50.11% stake in Hino Motors, while Daimler Truck owns 89.3% of Mitsubishi Fuso Truck and Bus Corporation. Under the agreement, the new holding company formed by Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso will be jointly owned by Toyota and Daimler Truck with 25% each. However, in the voting rights structure, Toyota will hold 19.9% and Daimler Truck 26.7%, meaning Hino will no longer be a subsidiary of Toyota. The new holding company, whose name is yet to be announced, will be headquartered in Tokyo with a total workforce exceeding 40,000. Karl Deppen, the current CEO of Mitsubishi Fuso, will assume the role of CEO for the new entity. Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the new company. In fact, as early as May 30, 2023, Toyota, Hino, Daimler Truck, and Mitsubishi Fuso jointly held a press conference to announce that Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso had signed a basic agreement to merge by the end of 2024, forming a new listed company to collaborate in commercial vehicle development, procurement, and production, with the goal of "creating a globally competitive Japanese commercial vehicle enterprise." The reason behind this lies in part with the scandal that hit Hino, which reverberated through Toyota. At the time, Toyota Motor President Koji Sato stated: "Our support for Hino has reached its limit." It is known that Hino was exposed in March 2022 for falsifying engine emissions and fuel efficiency test data, with the scandal escalating significantly in August 2022, severely damaging the company's performance. Hino posted net losses of 84.7 billion yen and 117.6 billion yen in fiscal years 2021 and 2022, respectively. In this context, Toyota was reluctant to single-handedly prop up Hino's operations and actively sought to introduce external capital, leading to the merger talks between Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso. However, Hino's engine certification fraud issue persisted for a long time. On the very day the merger agreement was signed in 2023, Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism announced that due to Hino's engine certification violations, the government had re-measured fuel efficiency values for 232 related vehicle models, finding that none met the values reported in their applications. Subsequently, Hino's scandal expanded overseas, facing class-action lawsuits in markets such as the U.S. and Australia, leading the two sides to announce an indefinite postponement of the merger in late February 2024. The situation took a turn in 2025 when, in January, Hino announced it had reached a $1.2 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to resolve issues of improper engine certification. Concurrently, Hino also settled cases in Canada, Australia, and other regions, bringing an end to overseas litigations. With a series of fraud issues largely resolved, merger negotiations advanced rapidly, culminating in the signing of the agreement on June 10. "Group for survival" under the pressure of transformation   According to the latest agreement, after the merger, Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso will maintain their respective brands and sales networks in Japan and overseas. Toyota and Daimler Truck stated that the merger aims to integrate resources and enhance competitiveness in the global commercial vehicle market. "Scale matters. In Japan, it's unrealistic for multiple commercial vehicle manufacturers to survive independently," Karl Deppen pointed out, noting that intensified competition from emerging-market manufacturers necessitates huge investments in areas like electrification. Behind the Hino-Mitsubishi Fuso merger lies the global commercial vehicle industry's urgent need to transform toward electrification and intelligence. With surging R&D in cutting-edge fields such as batteries and autonomous driving, small and medium-sized enterprises face enormous cost pressures. Notably, due to massive settlement fees, Hino posted a net loss of ¥217.7 billion in fiscal 2024. Hino President Satoshi Komukai called the merger with Mitsubishi Fuso a "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity." Additionally, as part of the merger to improve financial conditions, Hino will sell its vehicle and parts plant in Hanyu, Tokyo, to Toyota for ¥150 billion. Since starting operations in 1963, the Hanyu plant has primarily produced Hino and Toyota brand small trucks, as well as Toyota's Land Cruiser 250 and Hilux pickup trucks. The merger is seen as a key move by Japan's automotive industry to address global supply chain restructuring. Through integration, the two sides aim to pool technical resources, expand production scale, and enhance bargaining power and risk resistance in the global market. Hino and Mitsubishi Fuso will collaborate in commercial vehicle development and production within their respective strengths, while also cooperating on next-generation technologies like decarbonization and autonomous driving, with Toyota and Daimler Truck providing technical support. For example, the new company may share Toyota's e-TNGA electric platform and both sides' fuel cell technologies. Furthermore, facing the rapid overseas expansion of Chinese commercial vehicle brands, Japanese firms are seeking to leverage economies of scale to solidify their market position in traditional strongholds such as Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Currently, the two sides plan to complete asset divestment and business restructuring within 2025 to ensure the new company meets the governance requirements of the Tokyo Stock Exchange before listing. A source from Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) said the move could set a model for "strong-to-strong mergers" in Japan's manufacturing sector. Previously, in April 2021, Isuzu acquired UD Trucks' Japanese business from the Volvo Group for ¥243 billion, while launching a commercial vehicle strategic alliance with Volvo. Now, the Hino-Mitsubishi Fuso merger means Japan's commercial vehicle sector will form two major camps.

What if we can't make cars? The "nation on wheels" almost couldn't build cars... Yes, it's hard to believe that China not only has an enormous auto market but also controls the critical lifelines of the global automotive industry! As the saying goes, you never know until you're tested—and this test has revealed the truth. The production shutdowns at car factories across the Pacific have laid bare our hidden strengths. If there is no reliable channel to obtain certain components and magnets, some automotive suppliers may be unable to produce key auto parts, potentially causing car factories to shut down. Important auto parts familiar to us all, such as automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, speakers, lights, power steering systems, and cameras...   Due to the U.S. insistence on launching trade and tariff wars, it is now finally backfired by its own unreasonable bullying behavior. This "nation on wheels" may thus fail to produce cars smoothly, even affecting global listed automakers and industrial chains. On June 4, the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association (MEMA), an industry organization representing U.S. automotive parts suppliers, called on the U.S. government to take immediate action to address China's export restrictions on rare earths, minerals, and magnets, warning that the move could rapidly disrupt U.S. automotive parts production. "Severe scenarios may involve production cuts or even shutdowns of vehicle assembly lines," MEMA stated, noting that for automotive listed companies with domestic operations in the U.S., it is only a matter of time before car factories are affected.   Recently, as China tightens export controls on rare earths, several listed automakers in the U.S., Japan, and Europe are facing production line shutdown crises. U.S. listed automakers have already felt the impact of the restrictions. Ford Motor stated that due to rare earth shortages, its Explorer SUV production line in Chicago was forced to suspend operations for a week in May.   Suzuki Motor has paused production of its Swift model due to limited rare earth exports from China, becoming the first Japanese automaker affected. German luxury giants Mercedes-Benz Group and BMW Group have held urgent consultations with suppliers to ensure stable supplies of components containing rare earth materials. Specifically, Mercedes-Benz Group is exploring the possibility of stockpiling specific parts. On May 9, MEMA jointly sent a letter to the Trump administration with the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents major automakers including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Hyundai, expressing concerns about export restrictions on materials like rare earths. As is well known, China is the world's largest supplier and exporter of rare earth magnets, controlling approximately 70% of global rare earth production capacity and over 90% of magnet processing capacity.   Magnet products are used in various fields, from automobiles and fighter jets to household appliances. Given the clear dual-use nature of rare earths (civilian and military), China announced in April this year that it would impose export controls on seven categories of rare earth-related items, which is also a common international practice. These export control measures may include not only mined minerals but also permanent magnets and other hard-to-substitute finished products.   In fact, China's regulation of rare earths is not intended to "weaponize" rare earths, but rather a strong response to U.S. tariff measures and U.S. actions on Taiwan-related issues. However, due to the blurred line between civilian and military uses of rare earth products, the supply chains of some multinational listed automakers will inevitably be affected. On May 30, automotive issues became a topic of discussion during U.S.-China talks in Geneva. China also agreed to lift restrictions on rare earth magnet exports to U.S. companies. In response, the U.S. expressed its willingness to lift some tech export restrictions in exchange for China's commitment to relax rare earth export controls. In the past, people only knew that the U.S. could use chips to exert a stranglehold on other countries, but now it has been realized that China's rare earths can influence not only semiconductors and military industries but also play a pivotal role in the critical supply chains of industries such as automobiles and aerospace.

The following are the top ten global automotive news stories for this week (from June 2nd to June 8th, 2025):1. The 2025 Guangdong - Hong Kong - Macao Greater Bay Area Auto Show is being held in full swing: From May 31st to June 8th, the auto show is taking place at the Shenzhen World Exhibition & Convention Center. The auto show has gathered 112 complete vehicle brands, 1039 vehicle models and 50 new car launch events. In the first three days, 450,000 person - times of visitors came to visit. The transaction volume is expected to reach 4 billion yuan. It is expected that the total passenger flow and total transaction volume of this auto show will set new historical records. 2. Xiaomi Auto and "Gran Turismo 7" cooperation: On June 8, 2025, at the 2025 Gran Turismo World Series, Xiaomi and "Gran Turismo" developer Polyphony Digital officially reached a cooperation, and Xiaomi Auto's SU7 Ultra will join "Gran Turismo 7", which is the first Chinese brand model in the history of the series of games.3. Honda and Nissan Plan to Merge: According to Reuters, Honda and Nissan may announce an agreement in June 2025 to explore a merger by establishing a joint holding company. The goal is to reach an agreement in June 2025, and establish and list the holding company in August 2026. At that time, Honda and Nissan will delist.4. Geely announces the suspension of new automobile factories: Geely Automobile Li Shufu said that there is a serious overcapacity in the world's automobile industry today, and Geely will no longer build new automobile factories. 5. Tesla registrations in France fell in May: Tesla registrations in France fell by 67.18% in May. 6. The automotive industry advocates against "involutionary" competition: At the 2025 China Automotive Chongqing Forum, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology stated that China's new energy vehicles must not engage in price wars. Automakers such as Geely, Chery, and Changan also expressed their firm opposition to malicious competition.7. 2025 World Car Awards finalists announced: The World Car Awards jury composed of nearly 100 international journalists conducted the first round of voting and announced the finalists for the 2025 World Car Awards, including Audi A5/S5, BMW X3, Ford Mustang and other models.8. NIO to enter new European markets: NIO announced plans to enter seven new European markets by 2026.9. The US Green Transportation and Charging Pile Exhibition was held: Bosch, Hyundai, Toyota, etc. advanced the hydrogen energy ecosystem at the exhibition. Bosch exhibited fuel cell modules and the new CryoPump hydrogen refueling technology. Toyota showcased the Gen 3 FC system and announced hydrogen energy applications and investment matters in the US. Daimler and Blue Bird presented compressed natural gas and propane systems.10. The campaign of new energy vehicles going to rural areas in China is about to kick off: The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and four other departments have issued a notice to organize and carry out the 2025 campaign of new energy vehicles going to rural areas. The campaign will start in mid-June. A number of typical county - level cities with a low promotion rate of new energy vehicles and great market potential will be selected, and relevant enterprises will be encouraged to jointly participate in formulating integrated promotion plans such as purchase discounts. 

According to a report by Cankao Xiaoxi Net on June 8, citing a June 4 report by the German website Die Welt, German automakers are increasingly falling behind their Asian competitors. The accounting firm EY analyzed data from the top 20 global automakers in a research report. The report shows that while German automakers saw both sales and profits drop in the first quarter of this year, new competitors from China are showing steady improvements in their operations. According to reports, the combined sales of Germany's three major automakers fell by 2.3%. Only Volkswagen saw a slight sales increase, while BMW and Mercedes-Benz experienced significant sales declines. Profits at all three companies dropped sharply, with a combined decrease of approximately one-third. A similar situation occurred among U.S. automakers, with total sales falling by 2.9% and profits declining by nearly one-third. Asian automakers, particularly those from China, performed significantly better. Chinese automakers saw nearly a 15% increase in sales and an even more striking 66% rise in profits. Growth was particularly strong at BYD and Geely, the parent company of Volvo. Japanese and South Korean automakers also outperformed their European and American counterparts. Overall, five of the world's six most profitable automakers are Asian. Only BMW ranks third with a 9.3% operating margin. Established automakers led by German car companies are currently facing numerous challenges: weak economic conditions have curbed car-buying demand, while high costs and slow transitions to electric vehicles have squeezed profits. "Additionally, there is the problem of losing the Chinese market, where domestic companies are increasingly squeezing out Western automakers that once dominated," said Constantin Gall, a market analyst at Ernst & Young. Since April, U.S. President Trump's 25% tariffs on imported vehicles have exacerbated the plight of German automakers. Gall believes the new tariffs will further depress profits. "The gap between German car companies and Chinese automakers that have no operations in the U.S. will widen further," he said. In recent months, multiple German automakers and auto parts suppliers have announced cost-cutting plans including layoffs. But Gall argues that cost-cutting alone is insufficient to solve the problem. "Western automakers must completely reinvent themselves," he said, noting this includes resolutely advancing digital transformation and accelerating the pace of new vehicle development and decision-making. In his view, Western automakers should learn from the new challengers from the Far East in this regard. "The success of Chinese automakers precisely shows that what matters is not just investing huge sums of money—speed of action, flexibility, and clear investment priorities are at least equally important," Gall said.

In April, FAW-Volkswagen launched an organizational process transformation covering the entire Volkswagen brand system. From structural design to mechanism implementation, it completed systematic adjustments to six major sectors—market, marketing, customer, channels, products, and after-sales—in less than two months. Within a joint venture automaker with more than three decades of management inertia and a nationwide channel network, such rapid adjustment is uncommon. FAW-Volkswagen is now responding to faster market rhythms with greater organizational flexibility. The trigger behind this transformation is clear: in 2026, the Volkswagen brand will simultaneously launch 10 new models in the Chinese market. This time, instead of waiting for product launches to adapt its systems, FAW-Volkswagen has completed strategic preparations in advance, building a collaborative foundation for the next product cycle. In the new system, FAW-Volkswagen has clearly focused on three key objectives: improving market response speed, enhancing customer conversion efficiency, and strengthening product coordination capabilities. To this end, it has restructured its operational framework into "frontline operations, mid-level coordination, and back-end support," redefined seven market functions, and innovatively established a dual-link mechanism. In product management, it has also elevated its operations, with mid-level teams overseeing full lifecycle product management to improve closed-loop efficiency among R&D, sales, and marketing. In an era of accelerating evolution in user demographics and communication logic, processes and actions have become critical components of brand competitiveness. FAW-Volkswagen’s completion of this systematic restructuring in just over a month demonstrates not only its execution capabilities but also its market foresight and adaptability for a second entrepreneurial phase. Market variables have changed drastically, and traditional playing methods have failed In the past, the industrial paradigm of "building cars, distributing them to 4S stores, and waiting for customers to arrive" was highly effective. Today, even before a vehicle hits the market, users have already "seen and experienced" it through platforms like Xiaohongshu and Douyin. From product definition to marketing strategies, from user perception to purchase decisions, the entire value chain is simultaneously evolving. The most notable changes stem from automotive users themselves, and their pace of change leaves manufacturers little time to hesitate. According to data from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), consumers under 30 accounted for 42% of new car buyers in 2024. This generation of internet natives is no longer satisfied with merely checking specifications, test-driving, or haggling. Instead, they develop interest through short videos, seek recommendations on social platforms, and decide whether a car is worth buying based on friends’ experiences. This means that whoever controls the "content portals" holds the key to user access. More importantly, users’ attention is not solely on brands but on content itself. Whether a car is good is one thing; how compelling its story is told is another. Even the most advanced technology can be overlooked if it lacks digital visibility, and the most precise messaging can be wasted without a strategic communication rhythm. This does not mean 4S stores are irrelevant—they must evolve. Brands like AITO, Li Auto, and Xiaomi are opening company-owned stores while driving community-driven viral growth, transforming "delivery" into "continuous interaction" and reshaping automotive distribution channels. While traditional joint venture brands are still stuck in layered reporting and weekly review meetings, users’ choices may already be decided by votes in social media feeds. The old three-tier model of "headquarters sets strategy, regions execute, dealers convert" struggles to keep up with a market demanding minute-level responses. In contrast, the distribution channels built by new automotive players through efficiency can reach consumers faster and more accurately. Thus, another question confronts all traditional automakers: why does the marketing of joint venture car companies always fall short, despite having no shortage of vehicles, resources, or experience? Because marketing is no longer just about throwing money at the problem. In the past, it was about broad coverage; now, it’s about conversion rates. Previously, brands cultivated user interest; today, users are redefining brands in reverse. Many argue that the competition in this round of automotive consumption boils down to who can adapt first. Against this backdrop, FAW-Volkswagen’s decision to drastically reform processes and reorganize is about reclaiming competitiveness from within its organizational system. Because they have grasped a key trend: true competitiveness lies in the timeline of user engagement. FAW-Volkswagen challenges entrepreneurship with system strength While new automotive players emphasize decentralization and flat hierarchies, FAW-Volkswagen has taken the opposite approach, undertaking a top-down systemic reshaping. Instead of mimicking current trends, it is using organizational design to hedge against uncertainty and leveraging its system to manage complexity. The transformation starts from a core question: How can every vehicle not just be "built," but also "sold, promoted, and maintained successfully"? This is not the sole responsibility of the marketing department or the sales team alone—it is a matter of collaborative efficiency across the entire FAW-Volkswagen value chain. Thus, FAW-Volkswagen has restructured its originally linear, fragmented, and hierarchical structure into a three-layer system of "frontline operations, mid-level coordination, and back-end empowerment." In this new model, frontline regional teams have become the true frontline units "closest to the battlefield." While their staffing remains unchanged, their roles have been upgraded. District teams have expanded from a "1+2" structure to "1+4," requiring them not only to understand user sentiment but also to devise strategies and support dealers on the ground. This means the frontline is no longer just an information collection point but must have the ability to take proactive action and adjust tactics dynamically. The mid-level serves as the command center for decision-making and pacing. FAW-Volkswagen has integrated its Marketing Department, Product Management Department, and Sales Strategy Department, elevating these three core functions to specialize in coordinating resource allocation and strategy implementation across business lines. The key here is determining who best understands how to optimize the customer value chain. In FAW-Volkswagen’s view, the starting gun must be in the hands of those who best grasp customer rhythms. The back-end is no longer an information silo. In the marketing domain, seven independent departments are organized along the customer journey of "traffic pool—lead pool—incubation pool—transaction pool," with each node accountable for user experience and each link penetrable by data. This is akin to laying a new full-chain data pipeline, making all "invisible breakpoints" monitorable, optimizable, and evaluable. In customer operations, FAW-Volkswagen has innovatively established a "dual-link operation" mechanism: one link uses phone outreach, while the other employs enterprise WeChat for continuous engagement. Paired with digital tools like CRM systems and smart name badges, this achieves a closed loop from lead qualification to user remarketing. This mechanism is not merely about "two channels"; at its core, it represents a logical upgrade from "finding customers" to continuously influencing customers and from "dealers making calls" to "the brand proactively building relationships." A key signal from FAW-Volkswagen’s systematic response is that the Product Department is no longer a "handover post" after products roll off the production line. It now intervenes before product definition, listening to user feedback, analyzing data trends, capturing market sentiment, and feeding this back to R&D, marketing, and sales teams—making "front-loaded definition" a winning first move for product success. From organizational structure to resource mechanisms, from customer logic to product launches, FAW-Volkswagen is focusing on streamlining. It has cut through bloat, broken through bottlenecks, and concentrated on core tasks, transforming its massive joint venture system into a more compact, agile, and battle-ready formation. The outside world often uses the term "traditional automaker transformation" to describe these moves, but in FAW-Volkswagen’s view, in an era where pace determines everything, slowness equals defeat. While organizational restructuring may not be the most glamorous action, it is often the only solution to win the long-term battle. The system is implemented to be more capable of fightingOrganizational capabilities must eventually be verified by the market. The reform of FAW-Volkswagen is not for "being able to change", but for "being able to fight". If the previous organizational change was to restructure the "way of fighting", then the new cars in 2026 are the "results of this change."

As of press time, a series of chain reactions have begun to emerge in the automotive industries of countries and regions such as Europe, India, the United States, and Japan. According to recent reports by foreign media, last week China’s newly introduced tracking system for the rare earth magnet industry officially took effect. The system, which requires producers to submit information online such as transaction volumes and customer names, is not only a technological regulatory upgrade but also seen as a clear signal of the long-termization of China’s rare earth export controls—directly impacting the automotive and semiconductor manufacturing industries that heavily rely on Chinese rare earths. As of press time, the automotive industries in countries and regions such as Europe, India, and the United States have begun to experience a series of chain reactions. China implements precise control of rare earths in accordance with the law According to data from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and multiple research institutions, China accounts for nearly 70% of global rare earth production, over 85% of global rare earth ore processing capacity, and more than 90% of global rare earth magnet processing and supply. China's pivotal role in the rare earth supply chain has made it a key bargaining chip in international trade games. In recent years, in response to the United States' continuous escalation of technological blockade measures such as semiconductor export controls and Entity List sanctions, China has lawfully implemented precise countermeasures against rare earths and related technologies based on national security and development interests. The specific countermeasures are as follows: Since August 1, 2023, export controls have been imposed on critical semiconductor materials such as gallium and germanium (including eight items such as metallic gallium, gallium nitride, and gallium oxide). On December 3, 2024, a public announcement stated that "in principle, export licenses for dual-use items related to gallium, germanium, antimony, and superhard materials to the United States will not be granted," and "real-time and stricter end-user and end-use reviews will be implemented for exports of dual-use graphite items to the United States." By April 4, 2025, China further imposed export controls on seven categories of medium and heavy rare earth-related items, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, requiring enterprises to obtain a Dual-Use Items Export License. At the end of May 2025, He Yongqian, a spokesperson for China's Ministry of Commerce, responded to questions about China's dual-use items export controls: "Implementing export controls on items with obvious dual-use military and civilian attributes is a common international practice. This reflects China's consistent position of safeguarding world peace and regional stability." A Reuters report on June 4 stated that since last week, China's newly introduced tracking system for the rare earth magnet industry has officially taken effect. The system requires producers to submit transaction volumes, customer names, and other information online. The media noted that this move is not only a technological regulatory upgrade but also indicates that China's export controls on rare earths and related magnets may become a long-term policy, directly impacting the automotive and semiconductor manufacturing industries that heavily rely on Chinese rare earths. Global automobile production lines are facing a shutdown crisis As of now, the impact of China's control policies has begun to emerge. Due to the complex and lengthy export license approval process, China's rare earth magnet exports plummeted by nearly 50% in April this year. According to Chinese customs data, rare earth exports reached 3,056 tons in April, compared to 5,842 tons in March, a month-on-month decrease of 2,786 tons (approximately 48%). Under the influence of China's export controls on rare earth materials, a series of chain reactions have already emerged in the industry. Europe's automotive production is in crisis: On June 3, 2025, the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA) issued its first warning of "the possibility of production delays or even interruptions." The European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) revealed that only about one-quarter of the hundreds of license applications submitted since early April this year have been approved. Multiple European parts factories and production lines have been forced to shut down, and the situation may further deteriorate. If no solution is found, more production lines are expected to halt within three to four weeks. India's automotive production is on the verge of suspension: Previously, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) has informed Indian government officials that inventory among automotive parts suppliers may be exhausted by the end of May this year, and automotive industry production is expected to "gradually paralyze" starting from early June. On June 2, Indian Minister of Heavy Industries HD Kumaraswamy stated that the Indian government plans to dispatch a delegation of industry executives to China within two to three weeks to discuss restrictions on rare earth magnet exports with the Chinese government. U.S. automakers have begun warning that rare earth supply shortages caused by China's export controls could force them to halt production and close factories. Vehicle motors require large quantities of rare earths, and factory robots also rely on rare earths to operate. Against this backdrop, the U.S. is attempting "indirect solutions." Additionally, Japan's Suzuki previously announced plans to suspend production of its compact car "Swift" (excluding the high-performance Swift Sport model) from May 26 to June 6 due to parts shortages. Although the company did not elaborate, a spokesperson declined to comment on the reasons for the suspension. However, media reports citing informed sources said Suzuki halted Swift production due to China's rare earth export controls. According to a recent report in The Wall Street Journal, facing the threat of factory closures in the coming weeks, some U.S. automakers are considering relocating production of components such as motors containing rare earth magnets to China, or shipping U.S.-made motors to China for magnet installation before re-importing them—since China's restrictions target magnets themselves, not finished components containing magnets. Foreign media have mocked this as a "boomerang" effect on Trump's "manufacturing reshoring" policy. The United States is urgently seeking an antidote, and the road ahead is full of challenges Despite countries accelerating investments in alternative sources (such as Australia's Lynas and new rare earth separation plants in the U.S. and Europe), experts note that China's years of accumulation in rare earth refining technology and production capacity have created significant barriers. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has stated that between 2020 and 2023, 70% of the U.S. rare earth compounds and metal imports were dependent on China, with its refined rare earth supply dependency reaching as high as 92%. In response, the U.S. is adopting a multi-pronged approach to increase rare earth supply sources, but faces enormous obstacles. On one hand, restarting domestic mining in the U.S. has been difficult. The Trump administration has pushed for "America First," aiming to accelerate domestic mining permits. However, years of regulatory inefficiencies, environmental pressures (ESG), and "NIMBYism" (Not In My Backyard) have severely hindered progress. Currently, the only rare earth mine operating in the U.S. is Mountain Pass in California, which remains heavily dependent on China for refining and processing. On the other hand, beyond attempting to mine rare earths domestically, the U.S. is also addressing supply chain risks through partnerships with allies. The Trump administration has continued resource strategies, such as actively promoting bilateral cooperation with countries like Australia and Mozambique, and using newly established financial tools (such as fast-track approval and financing support) to invest in overseas projects, including graphite mining in Mozambique and rare earth processing facilities in Australia. Notably, Greenland, rich in rare earths, is seen as a potential alternative source. However, the region lacks infrastructure, faces harsh climates, and suffers from a shortage of skilled workers. Additionally, Trump's controversial remarks about considering "military force to acquire Greenland" have scared off investors. While deep-sea mining holds potential, it faces strong environmental opposition and legal restrictions due to the U.S. non-ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Long-term game and supply chain restructuring Industry insiders generally believe that China is unlikely to lift its rare earth export controls in the short term. The "rare earth supply chain crisis" triggered by resource issues will force a deep global industrial adjustment. Currently, countries and enterprises are accelerating efforts to develop mining, processing, and recycling projects outside China, but building mature and sufficient alternative supply chains will take years and require enormous investment. Meanwhile, technological breakthroughs such as developing dysprosium-free magnets, finding rare earth substitute materials, and improving recycling efficiency can partially alleviate the rare earth gaps in these countries and regions. In January this year, Grace Lyn Baskaran, Director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), published a commentary noting that the U.S. urgently needs to reduce its dependence on China for critical minerals, establish alternative procurement partnerships, and provide sustained diplomatic and financial support—steps crucial for long-term supply chain security. The launch of China’s tracking system for rare earths may signal that export controls are entering a phase of refinement and normalization. Against this backdrop, both the production line alarms at European automakers and the "roundabout tactics" of U.S. manufacturers reveal that global high-end manufacturing will remain subject to China’s rare earth export policies until stable and sufficient alternative solutions are found.